From: "Matthias Herrmanny" <Matthias.Herrmanny@gmx.de>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Help with the loss of a software raid (5)
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 13:44:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120625114435.10700@gmx.net> (raw)
Good day, sorry for my English schelchtes.
I have a little problem with my two raid 5 system.
I have been in use Ubuntu 11.xx and then I lost 2 hard drives with a hardware defect, whereupon I have my new hard drives 2TB concerned. Since Ubuntu can not handle drives larger than 2TB, I've also changed Centos 6.2.
One of my two Raid 5 5x (250Gb) system, I can write off. Since there are two disc finally broken (hardware failure)
The other raid 5 system (3x 80G) I have then taken. Now on a disc that has no partition disappears, the second one was a spare Displayed and the third has no superblock more.
[root@sonne ~]# fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sdg: 82.0 GB, 81964302336 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 9964 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00032373
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
Disk /dev/sde: 120.1 GB, 120060444672 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 14596 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00037e0a
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sde1 1 9970 80076800 fd Linux raid autodetect
/dev/sde2 9970 14597 37167105 5 Extended
/dev/sde5 9970 14597 37167104 fd Linux raid autodetect
Disk /dev/sdf: 82.0 GB, 81964302336 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 9964 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00050d72
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdf1 1 9965 80041984 fd Linux raid autodetect
[root@sonne ~]# mdadm --examine /dev/sdf1
/dev/sdf1:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 1.2
Feature Map : 0x0
Array UUID : 5874972e:5326304f:37228c78:dd15d965
Name : sonne:5
Creation Time : Sun Nov 27 03:44:57 2011
Raid Level : -unknown-
Raid Devices : 0
Avail Dev Size : 160081920 (76.33 GiB 81.96 GB)
Data Offset : 2048 sectors
Super Offset : 8 sectors
State : active
Device UUID : 8bc40fb6:73fe82b4:c1c001f6:046775d4
Update Time : Mon Jun 18 01:35:12 2012
Checksum : 59fcdac3 - correct
Events : 2
Device Role : spare
Array State : ('A' == active, '.' == missing)
[root@sonne ~]# mdadm --examine /dev/sde1
/dev/sde1:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 1.2
Feature Map : 0x0
Array UUID : 5874972e:5326304f:37228c78:dd15d965
Name : sonne:5
Creation Time : Sun Nov 27 03:44:57 2011
Raid Level : -unknown-
Raid Devices : 0
Avail Dev Size : 160151552 (76.37 GiB 82.00 GB)
Used Dev Size : 160081920 (76.33 GiB 81.96 GB)
Data Offset : 2048 sectors
Super Offset : 8 sectors
State : active
Device UUID : eab5a0b6:f7034d85:b143bc4c:4f3b5054
Update Time : Mon Jun 18 01:35:12 2012
Checksum : 1ee38df - correct
Events : 2
Device Role : spare
Array State : ('A' == active, '.' == missing)
Now I've put some try to run the RAID system again. Unfortunately, all to no avail.
mdadm -A /dev/md125 /dev/sde1 /dev/sdf1 /dev/sdg1
mdadm: cannot open device /dev/sde1: Device or resource busy
mdadm: /dev/sde1 has no superblock - assembly aborted
mdadm -Av /md/md5 --uuid5874972e:5326304f:37228c78:dd15d965 /dev/*
mdadm --manage /dev/md125 --re-add /dev/sdg1
mdadm: cannot get array info for /dev/md125
mdadm --assemble /dev/md125 --auto=yes --scan --update=summaries --verbose
mdadm: /dev/md125 not identified in config file.
mdadm -Cv /dev/md125 -e 1.20 --assume-clean -n3 -l5 /dev/sde1 /dev/sdf1 /dev/sdg1
mdadm: unrecognised metadata identifier: 1.20
mdadm -Cv /dev/md125 -e 1.20 --assume-clean -n3 -l5 /dev/sde1 /dev/sdf1 /dev/sdg1 --force
mdadm: unrecognised metadata identifier: 1.20
I hope you still have an idea how I got the raid again and running quickly.
Thanks in advance.
MFG
Herrmanny
--
Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir
belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de
next reply other threads:[~2012-06-25 11:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-25 11:44 Matthias Herrmanny [this message]
2012-06-25 23:44 ` Help with the loss of a software raid (5) NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120625114435.10700@gmx.net \
--to=matthias.herrmanny@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.