From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: marex@denx.de (Marek Vasut)
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 17:43:54 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] MXS: Enable FLEXCAN for MXS/DT
In-Reply-To: <20120626140717.GB9294@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
References: <1338084709-12043-1-git-send-email-marex@denx.de>
 <4FE9A04F.8030109@pengutronix.de>
 <20120626140717.GB9294@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
Message-ID: <201206261743.54627.marex@denx.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Dear Shawn Guo,

> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 01:43:11PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> > Yes, but the HAVE_CAN_FLEXCAN is used to make the driver available in
> > Kconfig. What about removing the "depends on HAVE_CAN_FLEXCAN" from the
> > driver symbol in Kconfig? I can push it via net-next and it will be
> > mainline in 3.6. You can remove the HAVE_CAN_FLEXCAN from the ARM (and
> > powerpc) trees.
> 
> Ok, that works for me if you would like to have the CAN_FLEXCAN show
> up anyway for all the ARCHs, but otherwise we just end up with replacing
> "depends on HAVE_CAN_FLEXCAN" with "depends on ARCH_MXS || ARCH_MXC".

PPC also uses the flexcan, so don't forget about that.

Best regards,
Marek Vasut