From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751250Ab2F3FCt (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jun 2012 01:02:49 -0400 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:36802 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750782Ab2F3FCr (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jun 2012 01:02:47 -0400 Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 06:02:38 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Mimi Zohar Cc: Oleg Nesterov , Linus Torvalds , ". James Morris" , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel , David Howells Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Was: deferring __fput() Message-ID: <20120630050238.GZ14083@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20120625060357.GT14083@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20120625151812.GA16062@redhat.com> <20120627183721.GA23086@redhat.com> <20120628043836.GW14083@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <1340947838.2293.2.camel@falcor> <20120629083311.GX14083@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <1340974925.2309.13.camel@falcor> <20120629174130.GY14083@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <1341005929.2194.9.camel@falcor.watson.ibm.com> <1341014197.2342.7.camel@falcor.watson.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1341014197.2342.7.camel@falcor.watson.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 07:56:37PM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote: > Looking at /var/log/messages, seems like the ata4 and ata5 "SATA link > down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)" messages are normal. > > ata5: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) > Freeing unused kernel memory: 1016k freed > Write protecting the kernel read-only data: 12288k > Freeing unused kernel memory: 1964k freed > Freeing unused kernel memory: 1468k freed > Failed to execute /init > Kernel panic - not syncing. No init Found. Try passing init= option ... > Pid: 1, comm: swapper/0 not tainted 3.5.0-rc1+ > Call Trace: > panic > init_post > kernel_init > ?do_early_param > kernel_thread_helper > start_kernel Just to make sure - you are not getting IMA violations among all that? AFAICS, the damn thing should behave no worse in that respect than your own patch a while ago, and you haven't mentioned them in this thread, but...