Re: [PATCH v2] mm/memcg: mem_cgroup_resize_xxx_limit can guarantee memcg->res.limit <= memcg->memsw.limit

[Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>]

On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 11:24:15AM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> From: Wanpeng Li <liwp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> Changlog:
> 
> V2:
> * correct title

Would it be possible to collect all these comment fixes you send out
every other day into a single patch?

> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@gmail.com>
> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 4b64fe0..a501660 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -3418,7 +3418,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>  		/*
>  		 * Rather than hide all in some function, I do this in
>  		 * open coded manner. You see what this really does.
> -		 * We have to guarantee memcg->res.limit < memcg->memsw.limit.
> +		 * We have to guarantee memcg->res.limit <= memcg->memsw.limit.
>  		 */

It would probably make sense to also remove the first two sentences,
they add nothing of value.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>