From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP: config : disable the usb host configuration in omap2plus_defconfig Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 05:39:13 -0700 Message-ID: <20120706123913.GX1122@atomide.com> References: <1341575380-11972-1-git-send-email-keshava_mgowda@ti.com> <20120706120700.GV1122@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:41098 "EHLO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752809Ab2GFMjP (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jul 2012 08:39:15 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Munegowda, Keshava" Cc: "Shilimkar, Santosh" , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Partha Basak , sameo@linux.intel.com, balbi@ti.com, Kevin Hilman * Munegowda, Keshava [120706 05:30]: > On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > I think it's best to fix things properly, even if it means that it will > > take longer and go into next kernel version. > > This requires ehci remote wakeup feature to be implemented, which > will take at least to 3 months to > get reviewed in opensource. > hence for now kevin is also agreed to disable it by default; Why does echi need a "remote wakeup" feature? If you're talking about echi wake-up events, I don't see how that would affect core retention. Tony