All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
	Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] uprobes: __replace_page() should not use page_address_in_vma()
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 18:18:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120706161857.GA9218@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120624150021.GB23277@redhat.com>

On 06/24, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> However, page_address_in_vma() can actually fail if page->mapping was
> cleared by __delete_from_page_cache() after get_user_pages() returns.
> But this means the race with page reclaim, write_opcode() should not
> fail, it should retry and read this page again. Not sure this race is
> really possible though, page_freeze_refs() logic should prevent it.

This looks a bit confusing, I'll try to to make this more clear...
The patch itself was not changed.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/5] uprobes: __replace_page() should not use page_address_in_vma()

page_address_in_vma(old_page) in __replace_page() is ugly and wrong.
The caller already knows the correct virtual address, this page was
found by get_user_pages(vaddr).

However, page_address_in_vma() can actually fail if page->mapping was
cleared by __delete_from_page_cache() after get_user_pages() returns.
But this means the race with page reclaim, write_opcode() should not
fail, it should retry and read this page again. Probably the race with
remove_mapping() is not possible due to page_freeze_refs() logic, but
afaics at least shmem_writepage()->shmem_delete_from_page_cache() can
clear ->mapping.

We could change __replace_page() to return -EAGAIN in this case, but
it would be better to simply use the caller's vaddr and rely on
page_check_address().

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/events/uprobes.c |   11 ++++-------
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index a2b32a5..6fda799 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -127,22 +127,19 @@ static loff_t vma_address(struct vm_area_struct *vma, loff_t offset)
  * based on replace_page in mm/ksm.c
  *
  * @vma:      vma that holds the pte pointing to page
+ * @addr:     address the old @page is mapped at
  * @page:     the cowed page we are replacing by kpage
  * @kpage:    the modified page we replace page by
  *
  * Returns 0 on success, -EFAULT on failure.
  */
-static int __replace_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct page *page, struct page *kpage)
+static int __replace_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
+				struct page *page, struct page *kpage)
 {
 	struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
-	unsigned long addr;
 	spinlock_t *ptl;
 	pte_t *ptep;
 
-	addr = page_address_in_vma(page, vma);
-	if (addr == -EFAULT)
-		return -EFAULT;
-
 	ptep = page_check_address(page, mm, addr, &ptl, 0);
 	if (!ptep)
 		return -EAGAIN;
@@ -243,7 +240,7 @@ retry:
 		goto unlock_out;
 
 	lock_page(new_page);
-	ret = __replace_page(vma, old_page, new_page);
+	ret = __replace_page(vma, vaddr, old_page, new_page);
 	unlock_page(new_page);
 
 unlock_out:
-- 
1.5.5.1



  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-06 16:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-24 14:59 [PATCH v2 0/5] uprobes: write_opcode() cleanups Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-24 15:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] uprobes: don't recheck vma/f_mapping in write_opcode() Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-09 10:30   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-06-24 15:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] uprobes: __replace_page() should not use page_address_in_vma() Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-06 16:18   ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-07-09 10:28     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-06-24 15:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] uprobes: kill write_opcode()->lock_page(new_page) Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-09 10:29   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-06-24 15:00 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] uprobes: cleanup and document write_opcode()->lock_page(old_page) Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-09 10:29   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-06-24 15:01 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] uprobes: __replace_page() needs munlock_vma_page() Oleg Nesterov
2012-06-26 11:55   ` Anton Arapov
2012-06-26 15:47     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-06 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] uprobes: write_opcode() cleanups Ingo Molnar
2012-07-06 16:07   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-06 16:13     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-09  9:12       ` Ingo Molnar
2012-07-09 13:30         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-09 10:27     ` Srikar Dronamraju

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120706161857.GA9218@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=anton@redhat.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.