From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757758Ab2GFRd3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jul 2012 13:33:29 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:53235 "EHLO mail-pb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757357Ab2GFRd1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jul 2012 13:33:27 -0400 Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 10:33:23 -0700 From: Greg KH To: gaosen Cc: smurf@smurf.noris.de, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: USB: option: Add MEDIATEK product ids Message-ID: <20120706173323.GA2373@kroah.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 09:50:50PM +0800, gaosen wrote: > >From 86fcd5bb701bd927d588386c480c37784d10040a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Gaosen Zhang > Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 21:44:10 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] USB: option: Add MEDIATEK product ids > > > Signed-off-by: Gaosen Zhang > --- > drivers/usb/serial/option.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) This conflicts with the patch that you sent me a few days ago which I've already applied. What is the difference and why did you rename some of the #defines? Can you please send me an incremental patch on top of the other patch that you previous sent me, so that I can properly include this one, as it looks like it does add support for a few more devices? thanks, greg k-h