From: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ross Brattain <ross.b.brattain@intel.com>, Yi Zou <yi.zou@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] libfc: fix sending REC after FCP_RESP is received
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 10:40:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120706174031.4102.91244.stgit@fritz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120706173959.4102.12091.stgit@fritz>
From: Yi Zou <yi.zou@intel.com>
This is exposed in the case the FCP_DATA frames somehow got lost and fc_fcp got
the FCP_RSP, in fc_fcp_recv_resp(), since xfer_len is less than the expected_len
it resets the the timer to wait to 2 more jiffies in case the data frames are
already queued locally. However, for target does not support REC, it would just
send RJT w/ ELS_RJT_UNSUP. The rec response handler thus only clears the rport
flag for not doing REC later, but does not do fcp_io_complete() on the
associated fsp.
The fix is just check status of FCP_RSP being received already, i.e. using the
FC_SRB_RCV_STATUS flag, in fc_fcp_timeout before start sending REC. We should
have waited long enough if there is truely data frames queued locally.
Signed-off-by: Yi Zou <yi.zou@intel.com>
Tested-by: Ross Brattain <ross.b.brattain@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
---
drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_fcp.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_fcp.c b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_fcp.c
index f735730..5c8074b 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_fcp.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_fcp.c
@@ -1372,10 +1372,10 @@ static void fc_fcp_timeout(unsigned long data)
fsp->state |= FC_SRB_FCP_PROCESSING_TMO;
- if (rpriv->flags & FC_RP_FLAGS_REC_SUPPORTED)
- fc_fcp_rec(fsp);
- else if (fsp->state & FC_SRB_RCV_STATUS)
+ if (fsp->state & FC_SRB_RCV_STATUS)
fc_fcp_complete_locked(fsp);
+ else if (rpriv->flags & FC_RP_FLAGS_REC_SUPPORTED)
+ fc_fcp_rec(fsp);
else
fc_fcp_recovery(fsp, FC_TIMED_OUT);
fsp->state &= ~FC_SRB_FCP_PROCESSING_TMO;
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-06 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-06 17:39 [PATCH 0/6] libfc, libfcoe and fcoe updates for scsi-misc Robert Love
2012-07-06 17:40 ` [PATCH 1/6] fcoe: Cleanup locking on fcoe_percpu_receive_thread Robert Love
2012-07-06 17:40 ` [PATCH 2/6] libfc: add exch timer debug info Robert Love
2012-07-06 17:40 ` [PATCH 3/6] libfc: fix retries with FDMI lport states Robert Love
2012-07-06 17:40 ` [PATCH 4/6] fcoe: Remove redundant 'less than zero' check Robert Love
2012-07-06 17:40 ` [PATCH 5/6] libfc: don't exch_done() on invalid sequence ptr Robert Love
2012-07-06 17:40 ` Robert Love [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120706174031.4102.91244.stgit@fritz \
--to=robert.w.love@intel.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ross.b.brattain@intel.com \
--cc=yi.zou@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.