From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1SnNhj-0001Q8-Dp for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 01:37:15 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47182) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SnNhg-0001Oo-Bm for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 01:37:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SnNhe-0006mR-Qj for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 01:37:11 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:42553) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SnNhe-0006mJ-Hc; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 01:37:10 -0400 Received: by wgbds1 with SMTP id ds1so7115096wgb.30 for ; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 22:37:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=I/h5Poo9MshJbfRwZaz1XLAiRY0xQlkeVl40HZRKh0M=; b=A7wsEj4Sv5EwpJa3eEIQ20MAOXd5aU2vGzuoXTlU5/rhV12n3r9uCB09GWlvepbIv1 YH3MBoocSSToJdzWr8QlRxniZsvAc9OomxrEICJ1E1EuQ7yRsK0WkXpwe6BXrjTICF3U xKxu3tbJCGNGNwaK+FmZUlQhonX9RVBHCXnnOIpV/inKDolt4hUYHCpKz2w0+J6ZUHmT EYaRIMymyPtiKleMbDjLV0dneim4+0Ys6EcrJFGak6c7jVeE1KrV6dFmQWD9VI6GmG6b nGXMEsQQf6SZvalTSD4iLjcj1heWUjML69fI3Hv9aDvU3wMweO/gyLPdN4yHUxuFQ/nY /lbw== Received: by 10.180.104.168 with SMTP id gf8mr12816244wib.12.1341639427386; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 22:37:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from x2.localnet (ALille-154-1-14-67.w86-192.abo.wanadoo.fr. [86.192.117.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fb20sm14574738wid.1.2012.07.06.22.37.06 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 06 Jul 2012 22:37:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Vincent Pelletier To: grub-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: --recheck option Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 07:37:01 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.4.2case; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <201207070737.02248.plr.vincent@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 74.125.82.49 Cc: help-grub@gnu.org, "yannubuntu@gmail.com" X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 05:37:13 -0000 Le jeudi 05 juillet 2012 14:19:54, yannubuntu@gmail.com a =E9crit : > A) Which are the situations where the --recheck option of grub-install mu= st > NOT be used? In my experience (grub legacy, linux boot with /dev/hd* device names, years= =20 ago), I had to play with device map to be able to reorder boot device prior= ity=20 (or plug HDDs in a different PATA layout, I don't remember precisely). I could edit the map to fit the intended layout change, grub (without =2D-recheck) just followed, and machine could boot just fine. Nowadays I don't have to care about this, thanks to UUIDs everywhere instea= d=20 of dev paths. =2D-=20 Vincent Pelletier