From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
To: Octavio Alvarez <alvarezp@alvarezp.com>
Cc: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
680707@bugs.debian.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [3.4-rc5 -> 3.4-rc6 regression] Asus P5NSLI: lockup on resume from suspend
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 04:04:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120708090432.GF4625@burratino> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <op.wg30yabp6g6bxc@localhost.localdomain>
Octavio Alvarez wrote:
> The problem is a full system lock-up on resume.
[...]
> I bisected the problem as requested by Alan Stern, and tracked it
> down to the following commit:
>
> commit 2feec47d4c5f80b05f1650f5a24865718978eea4
[...]
> ACPICA: ACPI 5: Support for new FADT SleepStatus, SleepControl registers
Parsing that commit:
* new ACPICA-internal functions:
acpi_hw_execute_SST, acpi_hw_extended_sleep, acpi_hw_legacy_sleep,
acpi_hw_extended_wake_prep, acpi_hw_extended_wake,
acpi_hw_legacy_wake_prep, acpi_hw_legacy_wake.
* Various functions moved to hwxfsleep.c.
* acpi_enter_sleep_state_s4bios was moved to before
acpi_enter_sleep_state and acpi_enter_sleep_state_prep for no
apparent reason. Unchanged.
* acpi_enter_sleep_state_prep: factored out execution of _SST
(which sets System Status) into a helper. No functional change.
* acpi_enter_sleep_state: in the !(ACPI 5) case, just checks that
the sleep types are not out of bounds and calls
acpi_hw_legacy_sleep(). Functional change:
- disable bus master arbitration when entering sleep states other
than S5
No other functional change. _GTS ("Going To Sleep" hook) call
factored out into a helper.
* acpi_leave_sleep_state_prep: in the !(ACPI 5) case, just calls
acpi_hw_legacy_wake_prep(). _BFS ("Back From Sleep" method) call
factored out into a helper. No functional change.
* acpi_leave_sleep_state: in the !(ACPI 5) case, just calls
acpi_hw_legacy_wake(). _SST calls factored out. _WAK call
factored out. Functional change:
- enable bus master arbitaration
No other functional change.
So presumably it's the new writes to the ACPI_BITREG_ARB_DISABLE
register that cause trouble. The patch below tests that guess.
Now for a complaint. This would have been a lot easier if cleanups
that do not change behavior were split into separate commits --- one
commit per change. That makes it easy to verify that each patch
correctly does what it promises with no unintended side effects.
Though I understand that hacking ACPICA is hard, and there is probably
a lot to the story of its development I don't know.
Thanks,
Jonathan
diff --git i/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwsleep.c w/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwsleep.c
index 0ed85cac3231..615996a36bed 100644
--- i/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwsleep.c
+++ w/drivers/acpi/acpica/hwsleep.c
@@ -95,18 +95,6 @@ acpi_status acpi_hw_legacy_sleep(u8 sleep_state, u8 flags)
return_ACPI_STATUS(status);
}
- if (sleep_state != ACPI_STATE_S5) {
- /*
- * Disable BM arbitration. This feature is contained within an
- * optional register (PM2 Control), so ignore a BAD_ADDRESS
- * exception.
- */
- status = acpi_write_bit_register(ACPI_BITREG_ARB_DISABLE, 1);
- if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && (status != AE_BAD_ADDRESS)) {
- return_ACPI_STATUS(status);
- }
- }
-
/*
* 1) Disable/Clear all GPEs
* 2) Enable all wakeup GPEs
@@ -364,16 +352,6 @@ acpi_status acpi_hw_legacy_wake(u8 sleep_state, u8 flags)
[ACPI_EVENT_POWER_BUTTON].
status_register_id, ACPI_CLEAR_STATUS);
- /*
- * Enable BM arbitration. This feature is contained within an
- * optional register (PM2 Control), so ignore a BAD_ADDRESS
- * exception.
- */
- status = acpi_write_bit_register(ACPI_BITREG_ARB_DISABLE, 0);
- if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && (status != AE_BAD_ADDRESS)) {
- return_ACPI_STATUS(status);
- }
-
acpi_hw_execute_sleep_method(METHOD_PATHNAME__SST, ACPI_SST_WORKING);
return_ACPI_STATUS(status);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-08 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <op.wg3en6ij6g6bxc@localhost.localdomain>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1207072208270.508-100000@netrider.rowland.org>
[not found] ` <20120708025730.GE2961@burratino>
2012-07-08 4:19 ` [3.4-rc5 -> 3.4-rc6 regression] Asus P5NSLI: lockup on resume from suspend Octavio Alvarez
2012-07-08 4:30 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-07-08 6:39 ` Bug#680707: " Octavio Alvarez
2012-07-08 7:37 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-07-08 9:04 ` Jonathan Nieder [this message]
2012-07-08 9:46 ` Bug#680707: " Octavio Alvarez
2012-07-08 19:04 ` [PATCH] ACPI: Leave Bus Master Arbitration enabled for suspend/resume Jonathan Nieder
2012-07-08 19:32 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-07-08 19:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-08 19:45 ` [PATCH v2] " Jonathan Nieder
2012-07-08 20:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-08 20:33 ` Moore, Robert
2012-07-08 20:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-08 20:43 ` Octavio Alvarez
2012-07-08 20:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120708090432.GF4625@burratino \
--to=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=680707@bugs.debian.org \
--cc=alvarezp@alvarezp.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.