From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] uprobes: teach build_probe_list() to consider the range
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 15:35:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120709133510.GA8269@redhat.com> (raw)
Currently build_probe_list() builds the list of all uprobes attached
to the given inode, and the caller should filter out those who don't
fall into the [start,end) range, this is sub-optimal.
This patch turns find_least_offset_node() into find_node_in_range()
which returns the first node inside the [min,max] range, and changes
build_probe_list() to use this node as a starting point for rb_prev()
and rb_next() to find all other nodes the caller needs. The resulting
list is no longer sorted but we do not care.
This can speed up both build_probe_list() and the callers, but there
is another reason to introduce find_node_in_range(). It can be used
to figure out whether the given vma has uprobes or not, this will be
needed soon.
While at it, shift INIT_LIST_HEAD(tmp_list) into build_probe_list().
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 6194edb..c825404 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -939,59 +939,66 @@ void uprobe_unregister(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consume
put_uprobe(uprobe);
}
-/*
- * Of all the nodes that correspond to the given inode, return the node
- * with the least offset.
- */
-static struct rb_node *find_least_offset_node(struct inode *inode)
+static struct rb_node *
+find_node_in_range(struct inode *inode, loff_t min, loff_t max)
{
- struct uprobe u = { .inode = inode, .offset = 0};
struct rb_node *n = uprobes_tree.rb_node;
- struct rb_node *close_node = NULL;
- struct uprobe *uprobe;
- int match;
while (n) {
- uprobe = rb_entry(n, struct uprobe, rb_node);
- match = match_uprobe(&u, uprobe);
-
- if (uprobe->inode == inode)
- close_node = n;
+ struct uprobe *u = rb_entry(n, struct uprobe, rb_node);
- if (!match)
- return close_node;
-
- if (match < 0)
+ if (inode < u->inode) {
n = n->rb_left;
- else
+ } else if (inode > u->inode) {
n = n->rb_right;
+ } else {
+ if (max < u->offset)
+ n = n->rb_left;
+ else if (min > u->offset)
+ n = n->rb_right;
+ else
+ break;
+ }
}
- return close_node;
+ return n;
}
/*
- * For a given inode, build a list of probes that need to be inserted.
+ * For a given range in vma, build a list of probes that need to be inserted.
*/
-static void build_probe_list(struct inode *inode, struct list_head *head)
+static void build_probe_list(struct inode *inode,
+ struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+ unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
+ struct list_head *head)
{
- struct uprobe *uprobe;
+ loff_t min, max;
unsigned long flags;
- struct rb_node *n;
-
- spin_lock_irqsave(&uprobes_treelock, flags);
-
- n = find_least_offset_node(inode);
+ struct rb_node *n, *t;
+ struct uprobe *u;
- for (; n; n = rb_next(n)) {
- uprobe = rb_entry(n, struct uprobe, rb_node);
- if (uprobe->inode != inode)
- break;
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(head);
+ min = ((loff_t)vma->vm_pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT) + start - vma->vm_start;
+ max = min + (end - start) - 1;
- list_add(&uprobe->pending_list, head);
- atomic_inc(&uprobe->ref);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&uprobes_treelock, flags);
+ n = find_node_in_range(inode, min, max);
+ if (n) {
+ for (t = n; t; t = rb_prev(t)) {
+ u = rb_entry(t, struct uprobe, rb_node);
+ if (u->inode != inode || u->offset < min)
+ break;
+ list_add(&u->pending_list, head);
+ atomic_inc(&u->ref);
+ }
+ for (t = n; (t = rb_next(t)); ) {
+ u = rb_entry(t, struct uprobe, rb_node);
+ if (u->inode != inode || u->offset > max)
+ break;
+ list_add(&u->pending_list, head);
+ atomic_inc(&u->ref);
+ }
}
-
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&uprobes_treelock, flags);
}
@@ -1021,9 +1028,8 @@ int uprobe_mmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
if (!inode)
return 0;
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tmp_list);
mutex_lock(uprobes_mmap_hash(inode));
- build_probe_list(inode, &tmp_list);
+ build_probe_list(inode, vma, vma->vm_start, vma->vm_end, &tmp_list);
ret = 0;
count = 0;
@@ -1032,11 +1038,6 @@ int uprobe_mmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
if (!ret) {
loff_t vaddr = vma_address(vma, uprobe->offset);
- if (vaddr < vma->vm_start || vaddr >= vma->vm_end) {
- put_uprobe(uprobe);
- continue;
- }
-
ret = install_breakpoint(uprobe, vma->vm_mm, vma, vaddr);
/*
* We can race against uprobe_register(), see the
@@ -1092,21 +1093,17 @@ void uprobe_munmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start, unsigned lon
if (!inode)
return;
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tmp_list);
mutex_lock(uprobes_mmap_hash(inode));
- build_probe_list(inode, &tmp_list);
+ build_probe_list(inode, vma, start, end, &tmp_list);
list_for_each_entry_safe(uprobe, u, &tmp_list, pending_list) {
loff_t vaddr = vma_address(vma, uprobe->offset);
-
- if (vaddr >= start && vaddr < end) {
- /*
- * An unregister could have removed the probe before
- * unmap. So check before we decrement the count.
- */
- if (is_swbp_at_addr(vma->vm_mm, vaddr) == 1)
- atomic_dec(&vma->vm_mm->uprobes_state.count);
- }
+ /*
+ * An unregister could have removed the probe before
+ * unmap. So check before we decrement the count.
+ */
+ if (is_swbp_at_addr(vma->vm_mm, vaddr) == 1)
+ atomic_dec(&vma->vm_mm->uprobes_state.count);
put_uprobe(uprobe);
}
mutex_unlock(uprobes_mmap_hash(inode));
--
1.5.5.1
next reply other threads:[~2012-07-09 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-09 13:35 Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-07-09 13:39 ` [PATCH] uprobes: teach build_probe_list() to consider the range Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-26 4:59 ` Srikar Dronamraju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120709133510.GA8269@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=anton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.