From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/14] ARM: OMAP5: Add minimal support for OMAP5430 SOC Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 01:37:27 -0700 Message-ID: <20120710083726.GN1122@atomide.com> References: <1341566515-22665-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <1341566515-22665-5-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <4FFA9B61.8030808@ti.com> <20120709131156.GH1122@atomide.com> <79CD15C6BA57404B839C016229A409A83EA69538@DBDE01.ent.ti.com> <20120710081851.GL1122@atomide.com> <79CD15C6BA57404B839C016229A409A83EA699A3@DBDE01.ent.ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.71]:27674 "EHLO mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753598Ab2GJIhc (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jul 2012 04:37:32 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <79CD15C6BA57404B839C016229A409A83EA699A3@DBDE01.ent.ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Hiremath, Vaibhav" Cc: Paul Walmsley , "Shilimkar, Santosh" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "R, Sricharan" * Hiremath, Vaibhav [120710 01:35]: > On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 13:48:52, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > No thanks.. We don't want to make it 32 bit and bloat all the compiled in > > clock even further. > > > > In that case, how about just get rid of cpu_mask completely and trust the > data passed by clock-tree for clksel dividers? > Let clock-tree data handle this, even if in some cases we end up in > duplicating data for some clocks?? Yes something like that. We already know which clocks need to be registered, so whatever we still use CK_XXXX for should be also initialized in omapxxxx_clk_init() functions. Regards, Tony From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 01:37:27 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v2 04/14] ARM: OMAP5: Add minimal support for OMAP5430 SOC In-Reply-To: <79CD15C6BA57404B839C016229A409A83EA699A3@DBDE01.ent.ti.com> References: <1341566515-22665-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <1341566515-22665-5-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <4FFA9B61.8030808@ti.com> <20120709131156.GH1122@atomide.com> <79CD15C6BA57404B839C016229A409A83EA69538@DBDE01.ent.ti.com> <20120710081851.GL1122@atomide.com> <79CD15C6BA57404B839C016229A409A83EA699A3@DBDE01.ent.ti.com> Message-ID: <20120710083726.GN1122@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Hiremath, Vaibhav [120710 01:35]: > On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 13:48:52, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > No thanks.. We don't want to make it 32 bit and bloat all the compiled in > > clock even further. > > > > In that case, how about just get rid of cpu_mask completely and trust the > data passed by clock-tree for clksel dividers? > Let clock-tree data handle this, even if in some cases we end up in > duplicating data for some clocks?? Yes something like that. We already know which clocks need to be registered, so whatever we still use CK_XXXX for should be also initialized in omapxxxx_clk_init() functions. Regards, Tony