From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:03:30 +0000
Subject: [PATCH v9] arm: Add basic support for new Marvell Armada 370 and
 Armada XP SoC
In-Reply-To: <20120710111655.071a4ab1@skate>
References: <1341588221-3822-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
 <20120710111655.071a4ab1@skate>
Message-ID: <201207101203.30984.arnd@arndb.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tuesday 10 July 2012, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Le Fri,  6 Jul 2012 17:23:32 +0200,
> Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> a ?crit :
> 
> > You'll find in this patch set the nineth version of the initial
> > support for a new family of ARMv7-compatible Marvell SoCs.
> 
> This v9 version has received Acked-by from Andrew Lunn on the
> different patches, we have solved the maintainership question of the
> new mach-mvebu directory, and so far there hasn't been additional
> comments on this v9.
> 
> Is there anything we can do to help in getting this patch set merged?

Usually I'm waiting for git pull requests, which fits the arm-soc
workflow best, but it's also ok to ask for patches to be included,
especially if you do not have a public git tree.

Should I apply the patches to a new branch in arm-soc or do you
send a pull request?

	Arnd