From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
arjan@linux.intel.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] Fix a dead loop in async_synchronize_full()
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 15:42:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120711154232.165cbca9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1341817465.4579.5.camel@ThinkPad-T420>
On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 15:04:25 +0800
Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> This patch tries to fix a dead loop in async_synchronize_full(), which
> could be seen when preemption is disabled on a single cpu machine.
>
> void async_synchronize_full(void)
> {
> do {
> async_synchronize_cookie(next_cookie);
> } while (!list_empty(&async_running) || !
> list_empty(&async_pending));
> }
>
> async_synchronize_cookie() calls async_synchronize_cookie_domain() with
> &async_running as the default domain to synchronize.
>
> However, there might be some works in the async_pending list from other
> domains. On a single cpu system, without preemption, there is no chance
> for the other works to finish, so async_synchronize_full() enters a dead
> loop.
>
> It seems async_synchronize_full() wants to synchronize all entries in
> all running lists(domains), so maybe we could just check the entry_count
> to know whether all works are finished.
>
> Currently, async_synchronize_cookie_domain() expects a non-NULL running
> list ( if NULL, there would be NULL pointer dereference ), so maybe a
> NULL pointer could be used as an indication for the functions to
> synchronize all works in all domains.
The patch is fairly wordwrapped - please fix up your email client.
More seriously, it does not apply to linux-next due to some fairly
significant changes which have been sitting in Dan's tree since May.
What's going on?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-11 22:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-09 7:04 [PATCH RESEND] Fix a dead loop in async_synchronize_full() Li Zhong
2012-07-11 22:42 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2012-07-11 22:50 ` Dan Williams
2012-07-12 9:56 ` Li Zhong
2012-07-12 16:41 ` Dan Williams
2012-07-16 18:32 ` Christian Kujau
2012-07-16 23:01 ` Dan Williams
2012-07-17 1:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-07-17 2:42 ` Li Zhong
2012-07-12 2:49 ` Li Zhong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120711154232.165cbca9.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lists@nerdbynature.de \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.