From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] uprobes: uprobe_mmap/munmap needs list_for_each_entry_safe()
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:29:06 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120712055906.GD3598@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120708203001.GA18223@redhat.com>
* Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> [2012-07-08 22:30:01]:
> The bug was introduced by me in 449d0d7c "uprobes: Simplify the
> usage of uprobe->pending_list".
>
> Yes, we do not care about uprobe->pending_list after return and
> nobody can remove the current list entry, but put_uprobe(uprobe)
> can actually free it and thus we need list_for_each_safe().
>
> Reported-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> kernel/events/uprobes.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> index 67697db..a93b6df 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> @@ -1010,7 +1010,7 @@ static void build_probe_list(struct inode *inode, struct list_head *head)
> int uprobe_mmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> {
> struct list_head tmp_list;
> - struct uprobe *uprobe;
> + struct uprobe *uprobe, *u;
> struct inode *inode;
> int ret, count;
>
> @@ -1028,7 +1028,7 @@ int uprobe_mmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> ret = 0;
> count = 0;
>
> - list_for_each_entry(uprobe, &tmp_list, pending_list) {
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(uprobe, u, &tmp_list, pending_list) {
> if (!ret) {
> loff_t vaddr = vma_address(vma, uprobe->offset);
>
> @@ -1076,7 +1076,7 @@ int uprobe_mmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> void uprobe_munmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> {
> struct list_head tmp_list;
> - struct uprobe *uprobe;
> + struct uprobe *uprobe, *u;
> struct inode *inode;
>
> if (!atomic_read(&uprobe_events) || !valid_vma(vma, false))
> @@ -1093,7 +1093,7 @@ void uprobe_munmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start, unsigned lon
> mutex_lock(uprobes_mmap_hash(inode));
> build_probe_list(inode, &tmp_list);
>
> - list_for_each_entry(uprobe, &tmp_list, pending_list) {
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(uprobe, u, &tmp_list, pending_list) {
> loff_t vaddr = vma_address(vma, uprobe->offset);
>
> if (vaddr >= start && vaddr < end) {
> --
> 1.5.5.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-12 6:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-08 20:29 [PATCH 0/5] uprobes: misc fixlets Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-08 20:30 ` [PATCH 1/5] uprobes: uprobe_mmap/munmap needs list_for_each_entry_safe() Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-12 5:59 ` Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2012-07-08 20:30 ` [PATCH 2/5] uprobes: suppress uprobe_munmap() from mmput() Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-09 8:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-09 10:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-09 10:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-09 10:25 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-07-12 5:57 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-07-08 20:30 ` [PATCH 3/5] uprobes: fix overflow in vma_address/find_active_uprobe Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-08 21:18 ` Joe Perches
2012-07-09 10:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-12 5:56 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-07-08 20:30 ` [PATCH 4/5] uprobes: kill copy_vma()->uprobe_mmap() Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-09 8:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-09 10:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-13 8:13 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-07-08 20:30 ` [PATCH 5/5] uprobes: kill insert_vm_struct()->uprobe_mmap() Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-13 8:11 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-07-13 13:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-13 14:02 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-07-13 14:02 ` Srikar Dronamraju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120712055906.GD3598@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=anton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.