Re: [PATCH 0/7] PM / I2C: Convert platform I2C drivers to PM handling based on struct dev_pm_ops

[Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1287 bytes --]

On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 09:21:10PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> As per
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=133996733422413&w=4
> 
> the following patches convert some platform I2C controller drivers to the PM
> handling based on struct dev_pm_ops:
> 
> [1/7] i2c-at91: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management
> [2/7] i2c-bfin-twi: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management
> [3/7] i2c-ocores: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management
> [4/7] i2c-pnx: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management
> [5/7] i2c-puv3: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management
> [6/7] i2c-stu300: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management
> [7/7] i2c-tegra: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management
> 
> I'd like to include them into my PM pull request for 3.6 if there are no
> objections.

The changes are fine by me. I'd like to pull them in via I2C, though,
since they are changing mostly drivers for which I have other patches in
the pile and I'd like to see the conflicts myself. Is that okay? They'd
be in linux-next tomorrow. Or is there a dependency I missed?

Thanks,

   Wolfram

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]