From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 0/4] hfsplus: stop using write_supers and s_dirt Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:09:51 -0700 Message-ID: <20120712160951.74cbb3c1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <1342103191-17406-1-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Al Viro , Linux FS Maling List , Linux Kernel Maling List To: Artem Bityutskiy Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1342103191-17406-1-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 17:26:27 +0300 Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > Hi Andrew, here is v3 of the patches, could you please pick them instead of the > ones you have in your tree? I really do dislike dropping patches and replacing them. For a whole bunch of reasons. One of which is that a wholesale replacement requires a full re-review. Another is that wholesale replacement makes it hard to see what was changed. > The differences to v2 are: > > 1. checkpatch.pl warnings fixed > 2. removed 'cancel_delayed_work()' from 'hfsplus_sync_fs()' because it is not > enough to just cancel the job, we need to set the work_queued flag to zero > as well. I could do this, but it is simpler to just remove this tiny > optimization - we do not gain much with it. I caught this bug while doing > some more testing. And lo, when I look at "what was changed", I see that this patchset actually does *not* remove the cancel_delayed_work() call. What's up with that? This latest patchset is identical to the code which is presently in -mm.