From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 03:46:56 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] udev: sync udev rules directories with systemd units directories Message-Id: <20120714034656.GA10380@bongo.bofh.it> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1" List-Id: References: <1342214503-7931-1-git-send-email-w.d.hubbs@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1342214503-7931-1-git-send-email-w.d.hubbs@gmail.com> To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Jul 14, William Hubbs wrote: > /usr/lib/udev/rules.d. The reason is not because of udev, but other > packages which install their rules in /lib/udev/rules.d need to be fixed > to install them in /usr/lib/udev/rules.d. As the maintainer of udev for a distribution which still supports a=20 standalone /usr I fail to see how this can be an issue. Why should an upstream package install something in=20 /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/ if no distribution supports this directory? --=20 ciao, Marco --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlAA67AACgkQFGfw2OHuP7GN4gCdGyp6EkOCCaWfcYWq89euxOqK j6oAn0YIvaYW6TpkUJybljc5x837wPJ/ =WUmM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1--