From: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
To: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Michael Horowitz <mike@horowitz.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] git p4: remove unused P4Submit interactive setting
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 09:53:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120714135307.GA27609@padd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120705123010.GA31388@padd.com>
pw@padd.com wrote on Thu, 05 Jul 2012 08:30 -0400:
> luke@diamand.org wrote on Thu, 05 Jul 2012 08:20 +0100:
> > On 04/07/12 14:34, Pete Wyckoff wrote:
> > >The code is unused. Delete.
> >
> > I've used that non-interactive code path in the past, in the very
> > early days of using it (setting interactive to false manually).
> >
> > The nice thing about it is that if you're using git-p4 for the very
> > first time it lets you do the final submission to p4 by hand,
> > without having to trust the script to do the right thing. Once I
> > convinced myself that git-p4 was doing the right thing, I then
> > stopped using it.
> >
> > Is it worth retaining, perhaps fixed so that it can be set on the
> > command line and documented? Or just discard?
>
> My biggest complaint is that there's no way to enable the option.
> You have to edit the code to change self.interactive to False, as
> you pointed out.
>
> Then it doesn't help you with the submit message, and doesn't
> do the little details of cleaning up pure-copied files or
> changing the username for preserveUser.
>
> What you're doing makes sense, though, but maybe there's a
> cleaner way to provide that functionality.
>
> We could build the change then say "type p4 submit -c ... if it
> looks good". Still doesn't handle the little details.
>
> We could spawn a shell to let them go inspect.
>
> We could try to implement a "--continue" option, and give them
> a chance to edit.
>
> I've got an upcoming series that changes the interaction loop on
> conflict, and makes it easier to do some interaction at each
> patch, possibly before applying too. Might make things easier.
I did code up two new options to "git p4 submit":
--dry-run : just show the commits that would be submitted
--prepare-p4-only : open/add, apply patch, but do not submit
The latter prints a rather lengthy message about how to submit
or revert the changes. It fills the role of self.interactive,
hopefully.
I'll send the patches out for review once the other in-flight
changes have settled.
-- Pete
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-14 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-04 13:34 [PATCH 0/3] git p4: notice Jobs: section in submit Pete Wyckoff
2012-07-04 13:34 ` [PATCH 1/3] git p4: remove unused P4Submit interactive setting Pete Wyckoff
2012-07-04 13:49 ` Pete Wyckoff
2012-07-05 7:20 ` Luke Diamand
2012-07-05 12:30 ` Pete Wyckoff
2012-07-14 13:53 ` Pete Wyckoff [this message]
2012-07-04 13:34 ` [PATCH 2/3] git p4 test: refactor marshal_dump Pete Wyckoff
2012-07-04 13:34 ` [PATCH 3/3] git p4: notice Jobs lines in git commit messages Pete Wyckoff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120714135307.GA27609@padd.com \
--to=pw@padd.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luke@diamand.org \
--cc=mike@horowitz.name \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.