From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mondschein.lichtvoll.de ([194.150.191.11]:48728 "EHLO
	mail.lichtvoll.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751973Ab2GOOIv convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 15 Jul 2012 10:08:51 -0400
From: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, kohler@umic.rwth-aachen.de
Subject: Re: btrfs benchmark
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 16:08:49 +0200
References: <4FFE9647.3000707@umic.rwth-aachen.de> (sfid-20120712_165433_761444_AFEF05FB)
In-Reply-To: <4FFE9647.3000707@umic.rwth-aachen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Message-Id: <201207151608.50106.Martin@lichtvoll.de>
Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

Am Donnerstag, 12. Juli 2012 schrieb Bernd Kohler:
> Hi @ all,

Hi!

> in the last edition of the german Linux-Magazin, there has been an
> article about Linux filesystem performance test - the article is titled
> "Formel Storage - Linux-Dateisystem im Leistungstest".
> 
> The author of this article, Mr Michael Kromer provides his benchmark
> script on link [1] and as btrfs is mentioned there, I felt free to
> publish this here ;)

If thats the same article I remember currently, the author made some 
choices I did not understand. Like for example disabling write caches of 
the drives that have being testing. But could be that I refer to another 
article in there. Can´t check right now, cause I do not have the issue at 
hand at home.

> [1]
> http://medozas.de/2012-lm-fs-benchmark.tar.gz

Thanks,
-- 
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7