From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Baurzhan Ismagulov Subject: Re: quirk for Samsung 2443BW Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 13:00:12 +0200 Message-ID: <20120716110011.GC3428@radix50.net> References: <5003E93A.2000109@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from almaty.kz-easy.com (almaty.radix50.net [85.214.25.173]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C5D59E78D for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 04:00:31 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5003E93A.2000109@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Maarten Lankhorst Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 12:13:14PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > >>> Samsung 2443BW is 1920x1200 but reports 1920x1080 in the EDID. Attached > >>> is a proof-of-concept implementation of a quirk. It works on my i686 PC. > >>> > >>> The patch is against the latest linux-2.6. An attempt to clone > >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/airlied/drm-2.6.git (as > >>> listed in MAINTAINERS) resulted in "fatal: The remote end hung up > >>> unexpectedly". > >>> > >> I actually own a 2443BW and don't have the problem you're referring to? > > Samsung might have fixed the data. If you care to send me your EDID > > data, I can compare it with mine. Still, there are many users who have > > broken monitors; it would be nice to provide a fix for them. > Attached. You have product code 0x0587 and vactive of 1200 in the first detailed mode. I have 0x06b0 and 1080, respectively. So, a fix is needed for the latter model. How did you obtain the file? With kind regards, Baurzhan.