From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Vasut Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10 RESEND] mmc: spi: Pull out parts shared between MMC and SPI Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 12:59:14 +0200 Message-ID: <201207161259.15034.marex@denx.de> References: <1341555449-17507-1-git-send-email-marex@denx.de> <1341555449-17507-4-git-send-email-marex@denx.de> <20120716095741.85d959fc81ab759b10adcf25@kinali.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Fabio Estevam , Chris Ball , Wolfgang Denk , Detlev Zundel , Rob Herring , Stefano Babic , spi-devel-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, Shawn Guo , Dong Aisheng , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org To: Attila Kinali Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120716095741.85d959fc81ab759b10adcf25-HB9FjVmMKa7tRgLqZ5aouw@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: spi-devel-general-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org Dear Attila Kinali, > Moin, > > I just wanted to try out this patchset as i have a use for proper spi > support on i.mx23. But this patch (4/10) fails to apply at line 635 > [...] > > + struct mxs_ssp *ssp; > > > > iores = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); > > dmares = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_DMA, 0); > > The function variables do not match. > > Also a 3way merge didnt work as the comit on which this patchset was > based on wasnt found. I tried linux, linux-next, and the imx repos > from pengutronix and Shawn, to no avail. > > Is there any other repo around that i'm not aware of? > > Attila Kinali Well I have it rebased on top of current -next, but ... will some of the SPI maintainers possibly apply it to their -next tree any soon? Or why are these patches stuck as they are without much review ? It seems Shawn is OK with the latest version, so can these be applied? I'll post the rebased version again if necessary. Best regards, Marek Vasut ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: marex@denx.de (Marek Vasut) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 12:59:14 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 04/10 RESEND] mmc: spi: Pull out parts shared between MMC and SPI In-Reply-To: <20120716095741.85d959fc81ab759b10adcf25@kinali.ch> References: <1341555449-17507-1-git-send-email-marex@denx.de> <1341555449-17507-4-git-send-email-marex@denx.de> <20120716095741.85d959fc81ab759b10adcf25@kinali.ch> Message-ID: <201207161259.15034.marex@denx.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Dear Attila Kinali, > Moin, > > I just wanted to try out this patchset as i have a use for proper spi > support on i.mx23. But this patch (4/10) fails to apply at line 635 > [...] > > + struct mxs_ssp *ssp; > > > > iores = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); > > dmares = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_DMA, 0); > > The function variables do not match. > > Also a 3way merge didnt work as the comit on which this patchset was > based on wasnt found. I tried linux, linux-next, and the imx repos > from pengutronix and Shawn, to no avail. > > Is there any other repo around that i'm not aware of? > > Attila Kinali Well I have it rebased on top of current -next, but ... will some of the SPI maintainers possibly apply it to their -next tree any soon? Or why are these patches stuck as they are without much review ? It seems Shawn is OK with the latest version, so can these be applied? I'll post the rebased version again if necessary. Best regards, Marek Vasut