From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-we0-f175.google.com ([74.125.82.175]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SrSZ3-0001gy-Uq for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 13:37:09 +0200 Received: by weyr6 with SMTP id r6so860451wey.6 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 04:25:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=SHE2juhgRbIcnTYwyhmS3KT3xTowztD800fVNyVNCa4=; b=K87cYtLd9o37YdfSkgNDstu+n0y4CMUkX6Rc2pClq00/IxUwvFxUsjFgs1xs0Thnwe mFUW0JHNM7ZQsdTvmyM7Pj1GDrfeHNPan7Wj1Chr1Hm04xFOlNfKguEM2d1o8u09ttbL xsy6vzNaNZOq1enrVhv5wIuZ7Irm/euSwTXX/VtbOk/2Euu/Zm3G94sxnzNQn3au/ynK wVyXTLdkhoj24LwPsmnMoodjeqj+/7c9E9wpfKU16Hv8PGVdOvF8q7Od1Be9GD0aNnEh 2KLeho9bVX/YAp3RSm1PqKoplHL/xTd0QHeT/vKibytc78IjXuWZHg2jRC70xIdQ0F9j Injg== Received: by 10.216.116.70 with SMTP id f48mr301748weh.162.1342610749467; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 04:25:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([94.230.152.246]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w7sm32096999wiz.0.2012.07.18.04.25.48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 18 Jul 2012 04:25:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 13:25:59 +0200 From: Martin Jansa To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20120718112559.GK22569@jama.jama.net> References: <1342460316-5489-1-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com> <1342460316-5489-3-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com> <20120716174642.GK3729@jama.jama.net> <20120716175819.GM3729@jama.jama.net> <20120716180430.GN3729@jama.jama.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20120716180430.GN3729@jama.jama.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: [RFC][meta-oe][PATCH 3/3] blacklist.bbclass: Move to meta-angstrom X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 11:37:10 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 39740 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kkRamCq5m5VQq0L6" Content-Disposition: inline --kkRamCq5m5VQq0L6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 08:04:30PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:00:37AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Martin Jansa = wrote: > > > > > > Yes, but that would require distro config to be updated from > > > ANGSTROM_BLACKLIST_PN to PNBLACKLIST[pn] at the same time this class = is > > > moved or duplicate all blacklist entries now and then remove > > > ANGSTROM_BLACKLIST_PN after it's moved.. > >=20 > > synchronisation can be worked out if you are willing. >=20 > Yes, it can and I'm willing to do it.. that's why haven't responded just > with NACK :). meta-shr layer was updated yesterday to cope with both blacklist implemntations..=20 Cheers, --=20 Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com --kkRamCq5m5VQq0L6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlAGnUcACgkQN1Ujt2V2gBxDEQCcCnRJzES6/B11/OFRDW1Gn/tx UTcAn2O/B34ThFTdouA2CyzCd0iXLBYV =y4Gt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kkRamCq5m5VQq0L6--