From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 11:16:26 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Add Wondermedia Technologies (wmt) to docs/devicetree/vendor-bindings.txt In-Reply-To: <76F764B079F92A4E843589C893D0A022C381059B@SERVER.prisktech.co.nz> References: <76F764B079F92A4E843589C893D0A022C380F1D4@SERVER.prisktech.co.nz> <76F764B079F92A4E843589C893D0A022C381059B@SERVER.prisktech.co.nz> Message-ID: <201207191116.27273.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thursday 19 July 2012, Tony Prisk wrote: > Given that there have been no replies to this thread, and the restart patch has > now been accepted using 'wmt' as the vendor namespace - would it be safe to > assume we should formalize this in the vendor-bindings.txt? > > I'd like to try and have basic device tree support added for the next merge > window (or this one if it all goes well :) ), but it relies on the vendor binding being > formalized. What about devices that come from via though? Anything that first showed up in vt8500 or earlier should probably get a prefix identifying VIA rather than WonderMedia. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Add Wondermedia Technologies (wmt) to docs/devicetree/vendor-bindings.txt Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 11:16:26 +0000 Message-ID: <201207191116.27273.arnd@arndb.de> References: <76F764B079F92A4E843589C893D0A022C380F1D4@SERVER.prisktech.co.nz> <76F764B079F92A4E843589C893D0A022C381059B@SERVER.prisktech.co.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <76F764B079F92A4E843589C893D0A022C381059B-A1+cU8XkcJSYgi1/3OOQJ8krCUz0bFs7@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: "devicetree-discuss" To: vt8500-wm8505-linux-kernel-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Cc: Russell King , "devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org" , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Alexey Charkov , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 19 July 2012, Tony Prisk wrote: > Given that there have been no replies to this thread, and the restart patch has > now been accepted using 'wmt' as the vendor namespace - would it be safe to > assume we should formalize this in the vendor-bindings.txt? > > I'd like to try and have basic device tree support added for the next merge > window (or this one if it all goes well :) ), but it relies on the vendor binding being > formalized. What about devices that come from via though? Anything that first showed up in vt8500 or earlier should probably get a prefix identifying VIA rather than WonderMedia. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754099Ab2GSLQy (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jul 2012 07:16:54 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.9]:62343 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753963Ab2GSLQv (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jul 2012 07:16:51 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: vt8500-wm8505-linux-kernel@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Add Wondermedia Technologies (wmt) to docs/devicetree/vendor-bindings.txt Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 11:16:26 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/3.5.0-rc1+; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Tony Prisk , Alexey Charkov , "devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" , Russell King , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" References: <76F764B079F92A4E843589C893D0A022C380F1D4@SERVER.prisktech.co.nz> <76F764B079F92A4E843589C893D0A022C381059B@SERVER.prisktech.co.nz> In-Reply-To: <76F764B079F92A4E843589C893D0A022C381059B@SERVER.prisktech.co.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201207191116.27273.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:t3Cs2fVIidugG/1pXLQEickRxM/9eFP1T2iNHhDRJFL 3gqknMMBKofxfKoF+INDh+l6a9Fa0TyWULcRqa4nkzRqYrS4h+ MPjao9xSRjzq3ePIAUPx0onJzkFKLo3N5Ur+KA+mSw5OLSw8fL mC/mO5xHI94u01yS8NqKSw0uKAWCpy+yvez7U9AO5GwuOki8OC jh0RIqBfgYFZ/VmERUEObbCrYIeTKpK2TCndKCZVCF3oifn6Iw TcAfItYJtcf2cHyytjTgr190p4AEQ9cIlwLKJctHWeh4vbNdyT cmLFffXpSR46kAOw4IlwVA4cz2vz1nXk5ZRgE3GyM5q2PEvLxA N942ob+sF4qigu0MWAzg= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 19 July 2012, Tony Prisk wrote: > Given that there have been no replies to this thread, and the restart patch has > now been accepted using 'wmt' as the vendor namespace - would it be safe to > assume we should formalize this in the vendor-bindings.txt? > > I'd like to try and have basic device tree support added for the next merge > window (or this one if it all goes well :) ), but it relies on the vendor binding being > formalized. What about devices that come from via though? Anything that first showed up in vt8500 or earlier should probably get a prefix identifying VIA rather than WonderMedia. Arnd