From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Samsung cleanup-2 for v3.6 Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 09:05:49 +0000 Message-ID: <201207200905.50396.arnd@arndb.de> References: <142c01cd639c$2f081800$8d184800$%kim@samsung.com> <201207172058.28993.arnd@arndb.de> <194e01cd65fc$ce163be0$6a42b3a0$%kim@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.8]:57184 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752939Ab2GTJGO (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jul 2012 05:06:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <194e01cd65fc$ce163be0$6a42b3a0$%kim@samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Kukjin Kim Cc: 'Olof Johansson' , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, 'Sylwester Nawrocki' On Thursday 19 July 2012, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > 2. If you can, please use signed tags for your pull requests rather > > than branch names. A signed tag means that you can write the text > > for the merge changeset yourself so I don't have to do the description. > > Ideally the signing key should have signatures from other people in the > > keyring so everybody can check the authenticity of the request, but > > just having the changelog there also helps. > > > OK, I see. I will try to use it as per your suggestion. But I'm not familiar > with that now. So if you don't mind I'd like to send signed tag from next > merge window :-) No problem. It's not a big difference to me anyway. I suppose by then we will also have had the chance for keysigning at the ARM mini summit. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 09:05:49 +0000 Subject: [GIT PULL] Samsung cleanup-2 for v3.6 In-Reply-To: <194e01cd65fc$ce163be0$6a42b3a0$%kim@samsung.com> References: <142c01cd639c$2f081800$8d184800$%kim@samsung.com> <201207172058.28993.arnd@arndb.de> <194e01cd65fc$ce163be0$6a42b3a0$%kim@samsung.com> Message-ID: <201207200905.50396.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thursday 19 July 2012, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > 2. If you can, please use signed tags for your pull requests rather > > than branch names. A signed tag means that you can write the text > > for the merge changeset yourself so I don't have to do the description. > > Ideally the signing key should have signatures from other people in the > > keyring so everybody can check the authenticity of the request, but > > just having the changelog there also helps. > > > OK, I see. I will try to use it as per your suggestion. But I'm not familiar > with that now. So if you don't mind I'd like to send signed tag from next > merge window :-) No problem. It's not a big difference to me anyway. I suppose by then we will also have had the chance for keysigning at the ARM mini summit. Arnd