From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 10:48:17 +0200 From: Richard Cochran Message-ID: <20120723084817.GA30335@localhost.localdomain> References: <5009A292.4060508@grandegger.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5009A292.4060508@grandegger.com> Subject: Re: [Xenomai] Xenomai installation on P1020RDB List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Wolfgang Grandegger Cc: "Xenomai@xenomai.org" On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 08:25:22PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > > I tested Xenomai recently on a P2020 with mainline Linux 3.2.x with the > new iPipe-Patch and got very good latency results, especially with CPU > isolation: 65 us without and *8* us with CPU isolation. [I'm still puzzled > about the good results with CPU isolation. Maybe that's due to the new > iPipe-Patch. Need to re-test when time permits). I have listed the results > below. Almost a year ago, around Linux 2.6.38 or so, I measured 13 us maximum latency on the P2020 RBD when using CPU isolation. Thanks, Richard