From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: andrew@lunn.ch (Andrew Lunn) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 12:59:45 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] spi-orion: add device tree binding In-Reply-To: <20120723104333.GI4435@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1342805751-18048-3-git-send-email-andrew@lunn.ch> <20120722095328.GB5423@lunn.ch> <20120722190700.GD4557@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120722193243.GF5423@lunn.ch> <20120722224241.GH4557@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120723072749.GA18778@lunn.ch> <20120723093747.GD4435@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120723100809.GC18778@lunn.ch> <20120723104333.GI4435@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Message-ID: <20120723105945.GH18778@lunn.ch> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:43:34AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:08:09PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > From 528a19e9eda968cc673331d566cbfe20962d3b32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Michael Walle > > Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 19:16:28 +0200 > > Subject: [PATCHv3] spi-orion: add device tree binding > > I really shouldn't need to remind you about the format for sending > patches :( > > > +Optional properties: > > +- interrupts : Is currently not used. > > Would it not be better to just omit this if it doesn't do anything and > doesn't have any semantics defined? I was specifically asked to include this, which is why it appeared in v2, not the first version. I forget who it was who asked for it, maybe Arnd Bergmann? I can dig through my email archive if you want to know. > > I've applied this. If you could send the other patches that'd be > helpful... O.K. Thanks Andrew