From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jukka Ruohonen Subject: Re: Possible bug Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 15:07:42 +0300 Message-ID: <20120724120742.GA3293@marx.bitnet> References: <201207241401.54084.trenn@suse.de> Reply-To: jruohonen@iki.fi Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=Hh2GtDbD9Ad/UE9r93CdwUn/TBQApOn3f3qV5pnpqfg=; b=Ftg0V499+lZaNzAxw91+OAbxxvVoXym3I/YFKLvpRLXRMbmpjbUBC6GURRk/WvfOKk yzqx9/MJUozO6ptWADIa1R7oDeNjEzjxp5PpfTp2LZy+f0oLaC4+M6qLq+PYi3dEDXZD nPuy8VkIrYZO8y6bQ7NCO13EfQFTvhWNA1E1u/hZsSzSy1AtM729Y2INdFUaNIIOCo5F fbPAUxkCdDoipEiuNeMJPlTxnqmyu1A2HrqKcFfGcI4NtjEQKsBmGsMvWHSrRrOzwVMG WZ9MiqyYnTJsxXX9pgPVuC64O5tuqv5cQ5YU80rLzsAujOS8dk6x6SAemARGvA6Rnw0Z 79cA== Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201207241401.54084.trenn@suse.de> Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Thomas Renninger Cc: Ariel@bellino.com.ar, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 02:01:53PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote: > On Saturday, July 21, 2012 09:09:08 AM Ariel Norberto Bellino wrote: > > cpufreq-info shows this in my laptop: > > hardware limits: 800 MHz - 2.53 GHz > > available frequency steps: *2.53 GHz, 2.53 GHz*, 1.60 GHz, 800 MHz > This should be a typical and well-known BIOS setup. > For some reason some BIOSes export the highest frequency twice (or with > one HZ difference or similar). Linux kernel should be able to handle this > gracefully. This is nothing to worry about. I think this is because of the so-called Turbo Boost. I recall at least couple of Intel specifications or white papers in which it was adviced that BIOS vendors should report the "turbo state" as the maximum + 1 MHz. - Jukka.