From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86/build change for v3.6
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 08:55:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120726065506.GA8421@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120725201511.GA888@merkur.ravnborg.org>
* Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> wrote:
> >
> > No, the reason for the odd looking diff is that lots of lines in
> > arch/x86/Makefile have 8-space tabs for histerical reasons but
> > new code (such as this one) has proper tabs.
>
> Use of tabs for indent in a Makefile is just asking for
> trouble.
Ok, I guess you are right - see the patch below which was
another type of bug that could be introduced via not using
spaces properly.
We could do it the other way around: turn all tabs into spaces
and add Makefile checking in kbuild so that the build fails if
a tab is added to a Makefile?
Alternatively, is there perhaps some way to teach make to not be
so broken to depend on whitespace details that are *invisible*
to humans?
Thanks,
Ingo
Index: linux/arch/x86/Makefile
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/x86/Makefile
+++ linux/arch/x86/Makefile
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ ifdef CONFIG_X86_X32
KBUILD_AFLAGS += -DCONFIG_X86_X32_ABI
KBUILD_CFLAGS += -DCONFIG_X86_X32_ABI
else
- $(warning CONFIG_X86_X32 enabled but no binutils support)
+ $(warning CONFIG_X86_X32 enabled but no binutils support)
endif
endif
export CONFIG_X86_X32_ABI
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-26 6:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-22 13:44 [GIT PULL] x86/build change for v3.6 Ingo Molnar
2012-07-22 13:58 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2012-07-22 14:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-07-23 9:35 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2012-07-25 20:15 ` Sam Ravnborg
2012-07-25 20:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-07-26 6:55 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2012-07-29 20:42 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120726065506.GA8421@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.