From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Renninger Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] acpi-cpufreq: Move modern AMD cpufreq support to acpi-cpufreq Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 16:01:22 +0200 Message-ID: <201207261601.23973.trenn@suse.de> References: <1343305724-2809-1-git-send-email-andre.przywara@amd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1343305724-2809-1-git-send-email-andre.przywara@amd.com> Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Andre Przywara Cc: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Matthew Garrett , Andreas Herrmann , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, July 26, 2012 02:28:36 PM Andre Przywara wrote: > The programming model for cpufreq on current AMD CPUs is almost > identical to the one used on Intel and VIA hardware. This patchset > merges support into acpi-cpufreq and removes it from powernow-k8. > This patchset is heavily based on Matthew Garrett's V4 from last July. > The boosting part has been mostly reworked and documentation for it > has been added. Also there was a need for (yet another) BIOS quirk > on AMD desktop boards. > > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara I had a look at Matthew's patches and I like the idea. I didn't review Andre's in detail, but if they are based on Matthew's and I expect they got some testing, I guess it should be fine to push them with the next merge window. Thomas