All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lrg@ti.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Gyungoh Yoo <jack.yoo@maxim-ic.com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: add MAX8907 core driver
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 23:16:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120726221604.GL4560@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5011BF90.5030708@wwwdotorg.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1898 bytes --]

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 04:07:12PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 07/26/2012 02:35 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 01:40:30PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:

> >> +		if (irqd_is_wakeup_set(d)) {
> >> +			/* 1 -- disable, 0 -- enable */
> >> +			switch (irq_data->mask_reg) {

> > This loop we should just port over into the regmap code.

> I assume the best way of doing this is to add new functions
> regmap_irq_suspend()/regmap_irq_resume() (which would mask any enabled
> interrupts that were not wake enabled); that way, the regmap_irq code
> can loop over each register and just write it once. An alternative might
> be to implement struct irq_chip's .irq_suspend/.irq_resume ops, but that
> might worst-case end up with an I2C write per interrupt.

irq_suspend() and irq_resume() are only supposed to be called once per
irq_chip so there should be no concern with using them.  Even if they
weren't it's probably not that performance critical really.

> I see that the MAX8907 IRQ code does this in suspend:

> 	if (device_may_wakeup(chip->dev))
> 		enable_irq_wake(i2c->irq);
> 	else
> 		disable_irq(i2c->irq);

> and this in resume:

> 	if (device_may_wakeup(chip->dev))
> 		disable_irq_wake(i2c->irq);
> 	else
> 		enable_irq(i2c->irq);

> neither of which are done in regmap_irq, since it doesn't explicitly do
> anything for suspend/resume at the moment. Are those code blocks
> necessary? I see that regmap_irq_sync_unlock() is already calling
> irq_set_irq_wake(), which implies that suspend/resume may have already
> been completely taken care of?

Yes, it should already be taken care of.  What the calls here are doing
is mostly allowing userspace to explicitly override the wake state on a
per chip basis.  I'm not convinced it's terribly clever to implement
explicit wake support on an interrupt controller, it seems prone to
confusion.  We could do that though.

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-26 22:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-26 19:40 [PATCH] mfd: add MAX8907 core driver Stephen Warren
2012-07-26 19:40 ` Stephen Warren
2012-07-26 20:35 ` Mark Brown
     [not found]   ` <20120726203526.GD4560-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2012-07-26 21:14     ` Stephen Warren
2012-07-26 21:14       ` Stephen Warren
2012-07-26 21:51       ` Mark Brown
2012-07-26 22:07   ` Stephen Warren
2012-07-26 22:16     ` Mark Brown [this message]
2012-07-27  6:36 ` Laxman Dewangan
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-08-01 20:48 Stephen Warren
2012-08-02 16:15 ` Mark Brown
2012-08-02 17:11   ` Stephen Warren
2012-08-02 17:56     ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120726221604.GL4560@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=jack.yoo@maxim-ic.com \
    --cc=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lrg@ti.com \
    --cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=swarren@nvidia.com \
    --cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.