All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@gmail.com>
To: joeyli <jlee@suse.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: add new AMD ACPI header and update relevant code
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 11:02:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120727090250.GA12716@growl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1343364410.8142.42.camel@linux-s257.site>

On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:46:50PM +0800, joeyli wrote:
> 於 四,2012-07-26 於 23:31 -0400,Alex Deucher 提到:
> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:50 PM, joeyli <jlee@suse.com> wrote:
> > > 於 四,2012-07-26 於 14:58 +0200,Luca Tettamanti 提到:
> > >> - again ACPI video module gets the nodification (in this case
> > >>   ACPI_VIDEO_NOTIFY_PROBE), re-enumerated and send KEY_SWITCHVIDEOMODE
> > >> - KDE seems this and muck with the screen configuration :(
> > >> - meanwhile the brightness notification is propagated, the
> > >> hypothetical
> > >>   radeon driver does its magic to adjust the screen.
> > >>
> > >> My first idea would be to make ACPI_VIDEO_NOTIFY_PROBE also call to
> > >> the
> > >> acpi notifier chain, and allow the handlers to veto the key press
> > >> (like
> > >> it's done for ACPI_VIDEO_NOTIFY_SWITCH).
> > >
> > > I welcome this approach!
> > >
> > > On some ATI machine's DSDT also issue ACPI_VIDEO_NOTIFY_PROBE when
> > > AC-power unplug, because BIOS want to nodify video driver do some power
> > > saving stuff.
> > > It causes KEY_SWITCHVIDEOMODE issued by acpi/video driver when AC-power
> > > unplug.
> > >
> > > At least acpi/video driver need to know this 0x81 event is filed by BIOS
> > > to radeon-acpi for notify but not do video mode switch. That means the
> > > radeon drm need take the video switch responsibility.
> > 
> > Probably we'd just want the radeon acpi handler to just forward the
> > events to userspace so that the user can choose what to do with it
> > (xrandr command, etc.), otherwise we'll need to define policy in the
> > driver.
> 
> Any kernel module can issue KEY_SWITCHVIDEOMODE to user space, then
> gnome-settings-daemon(on Gnome) and  krandr(on KDE) will call xrandr
> library to switch video mode.

Exacly, and if we have pending system bios requests then the event is
not a real ACPI_VIDEO_NOTIFY_PROBE and (IMHO) it should not be forwarded
to the userspace as such.
The "vanilla" ACPI_VIDEO_NOTIFY_PROBE is already forwared to userspace.

> The 0x81 ACPI event for acpi/video driver is ACPI_VIDEO_NOTIFY_PROBE,
> means need issue KEY_SWITCHVIDEOMODE. But, 0x81 for radeon is a general
> notification event.
> I didn't see probe state in GET_SYSTEM_BIOS_REQUESTS, how can we
> distinguish this 0x81 is a ACPI_VIDEO_NOTIFY_PROBE or a ATI general
> notification event?

+#define ATIF_FUNCTION_GET_SYSTEM_BIOS_REQUESTS                     0x2
+/* ARG0: ATIF_FUNCTION_GET_SYSTEM_BIOS_REQUESTS
+ * ARG1: none
+ * OUTPUT:
+ * WORD  - structure size in bytes (includes size field)
+ * DWORD - pending sbios requests
+ * BYTE  - panel expansion mode
+ * BYTE  - thermal state: target gfx controller
+ * BYTE  - thermal state: state id (0: exit state, non-0: state)
+ * BYTE  - forced power state: target gfx controller
+ * BYTE  - forced power state: state id
+ * BYTE  - system power source
+ * BYTE  - panel backlight level (0-255)

I guess that if "pending sbios requests" == 0 then the event is the
general purpose one, and is not handled by radeon driver.

Luca
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-27  9:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-25 17:38 [PATCH] drm/radeon: add new AMD ACPI header and update relevant code alexdeucher
2012-07-26 12:58 ` Luca Tettamanti
2012-07-26 15:35   ` Alex Deucher
2012-07-26 19:33     ` Luca Tettamanti
2012-07-26 19:42       ` Alex Deucher
2012-07-26 19:58         ` Alex Deucher
2012-07-28 14:56         ` Luca Tettamanti
2012-07-28 21:29           ` Alex Deucher
2012-07-29 13:06             ` Luca Tettamanti
2012-07-30 14:20               ` Alex Deucher
2012-07-30 20:24                 ` Luca Tettamanti
2012-07-30 20:30                   ` Alex Deucher
2012-07-30 20:36                     ` Luca Tettamanti
2012-07-30 20:45                   ` Alex Deucher
2012-07-31  9:16                     ` Luca Tettamanti
2012-07-31 13:58                       ` Alex Deucher
2012-07-31 20:05                         ` Luca Tettamanti
2012-07-31 21:33                           ` Alex Deucher
2012-08-01  8:57                             ` Luca Tettamanti
2012-08-01 13:56                               ` Alex Deucher
2012-08-02 15:03                                 ` Alex Deucher
2012-08-02 16:31                                   ` Luca Tettamanti
2012-08-02 16:33                                     ` Alex Deucher
2012-08-02 20:54                                       ` Alex Deucher
2012-08-01 13:49                             ` [PATCH/RFC] drm/radeon: ACPI: veto the keypress on ATIF events Luca Tettamanti
2012-08-01 14:02                               ` Alex Deucher
2012-08-01 14:50                               ` joeyli
2012-08-02  0:45                               ` Zhang Rui
2012-08-02 13:46                                 ` Luca Tettamanti
2012-08-03  1:40                                   ` Zhang Rui
2012-08-03  1:45                                     ` Alex Deucher
2012-08-03  2:06                                       ` Zhang Rui
2012-07-29 19:33             ` [PATCH] drm/radeon: add new AMD ACPI header and update relevant code Luca Tettamanti
2012-07-30 14:29               ` Alex Deucher
2012-07-29  3:51           ` joeyli
2012-07-29 13:10             ` Luca Tettamanti
2012-07-30  8:32               ` joeyli
2012-07-30 14:16                 ` Luca Tettamanti
2012-07-28 14:39     ` Pali Rohár
2012-07-27  2:50   ` joeyli
2012-07-27  3:31     ` Alex Deucher
2012-07-27  4:46       ` joeyli
2012-07-27  9:02         ` Luca Tettamanti [this message]
2012-07-27 13:21         ` Alex Deucher
2012-07-27 15:32           ` joeyli
2012-07-27 15:36             ` joeyli
2012-07-27 16:31             ` Alex Deucher

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120727090250.GA12716@growl \
    --to=kronos.it@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jlee@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.