From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [U-Boot-DM] early_malloc() vs. enable_caches()
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 14:15:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201207291415.41866.marek.vasut@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50151642.4090301@gmail.com>
Dear Graeme Russ,
> Hi Thomas,
>
> P.S. I dropped the DM list...
>
> It took a couple of other emails to get what is going on here...
>
> On 07/29/2012 01:46 AM, Tomas Hlavacek wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > I am working on early_malloc() for U-Boot Driver Model (this malloc is
> > going to serve for internal DM structures during early init and it has
> > it's minimalistic heap in global data).
>
> Not exactly on-topic, but I really hope that everything is wrapped so a
> simple call to malloc() will work pre-relocation. Of course, everything you
> malloc pre-relocation will have to be re-malloc'd and relocated after
> relocation. Point is, early malloc should not be restricted to the driver
> framework
>
> > My question is how to correctly switch from early allocator to full-scale
> > malloc and when to enable caches.
> >
> > The current state (on ARM) is:
> > 1) gd = id;
> > 3) enable_caches();
> > 3) mem_malloc_init();
> >
> > Proposed sequence for mallocator (in order no to loose any data from old
> > and not-relocated part of GD):
> >
> > 1) gd_old = gd;
> > 2) gd = id;
> > 3) mem_malloc_init();
> > 4) relocation of DM structures
> > 5) early_malloc_disab()
> > 6) enable_caches();
>
> I'm thinking:
>
> 1) Low-level CPU init
> 2) 'Cache-As-RAM' init
> 3) Global Data init
> 4) Pre-console buffer init
Buffer?
> 5) Early malloc() init
> 6) Console init
You don't need console here ... probably, on some systems.
> 7) ...blah, blah, blah...
> 8) SDRAM init
> 9) Relocate Global Data
> 10) malloc() init
> 11) 'Disable' early malloc (i.e. malloc() now allocates from SDRAM)
> 12) Relocate from early_malloc_pool to malloc_pool [1]
> 13) enable_caches()
>
> [1] I'm thinking possibly compile-time registered hooks...
Gurr ... you mean like INIT-something framework?
> > Does it make sense? It actually boils down to one fundamental question:
> > When I have not-rellocated data locked in cache-lines, do I loose them
> > once enable_caches() is called?
>
> I believe that yes, as soon as you enable caching, everything already in
> cache (gd, pre-console buffer, early malloc pool etc) is as good as gone
Right ... that's why now it's copied to a safe location alongside other GD
(global data)
> Regards,
>
> Graeme
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-29 12:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-28 15:46 [U-Boot] early_malloc() vs. enable_caches() Tomas Hlavacek
2012-07-29 9:42 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2012-07-29 10:25 ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot-DM] " Marek Vasut
2012-07-29 10:53 ` Graeme Russ
2012-07-29 12:15 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2012-07-29 13:19 ` Tomas Hlavacek
2012-07-29 22:34 ` Graeme Russ
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201207291415.41866.marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--to=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.