From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/18] ASoC: Ux500: Enable ux500 MSP driver for Device Tree Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:39:30 +0100 Message-ID: <20120730133930.GB4468@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1343393162-11938-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1343393162-11938-6-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20120729204218.GI4384@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <50162F70.2050900@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (opensource.wolfsonmicro.com [80.75.67.52]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C44F2652F4 for ; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 15:39:30 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50162F70.2050900@linaro.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Lee Jones Cc: ola.o.lilja@stericsson.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linus.walleij@stericsson.com, arnd@arndb.de, olalilja@yahoo.se, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, STEricsson_nomadik_linux@list.st.com, lrg@ti.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 07:53:36AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On 29/07/12 21:42, Mark Brown wrote: > >>+ if (of_get_property(np, "stericsson,use-pinctrl", NULL)) > >This doesn't seem particularly sane... why is this conditional? > It's conditional because only MSP1 and MSP3 have pinctrl support. Why does the driver care - doesn't the pinctrl abstraction and/or bindings handle this sensibly? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:39:30 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 05/18] ASoC: Ux500: Enable ux500 MSP driver for Device Tree In-Reply-To: <50162F70.2050900@linaro.org> References: <1343393162-11938-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1343393162-11938-6-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20120729204218.GI4384@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <50162F70.2050900@linaro.org> Message-ID: <20120730133930.GB4468@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 07:53:36AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On 29/07/12 21:42, Mark Brown wrote: > >>+ if (of_get_property(np, "stericsson,use-pinctrl", NULL)) > >This doesn't seem particularly sane... why is this conditional? > It's conditional because only MSP1 and MSP3 have pinctrl support. Why does the driver care - doesn't the pinctrl abstraction and/or bindings handle this sensibly? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754207Ab2G3Njd (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:39:33 -0400 Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:35680 "EHLO opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753774Ab2G3Njc (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:39:32 -0400 Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:39:30 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Lee Jones Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, STEricsson_nomadik_linux@list.st.com, linus.walleij@stericsson.com, arnd@arndb.de, olalilja@yahoo.se, ola.o.lilja@stericsson.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, lrg@ti.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/18] ASoC: Ux500: Enable ux500 MSP driver for Device Tree Message-ID: <20120730133930.GB4468@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1343393162-11938-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1343393162-11938-6-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20120729204218.GI4384@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <50162F70.2050900@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50162F70.2050900@linaro.org> X-Cookie: Give him an evasive answer. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 07:53:36AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On 29/07/12 21:42, Mark Brown wrote: > >>+ if (of_get_property(np, "stericsson,use-pinctrl", NULL)) > >This doesn't seem particularly sane... why is this conditional? > It's conditional because only MSP1 and MSP3 have pinctrl support. Why does the driver care - doesn't the pinctrl abstraction and/or bindings handle this sensibly?