From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: drm/nouveau: crash regression in 3.5
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 19:16:29 +0200
Message-ID: <20120730171629.GA3271@joi.lan>
References: <500D916A.60703@odi.ch>
 <20120724170002.GA3129@joi.lan>
 <500ED9EC.5040309@odi.ch>
 <20120724205746.GA8707@joi.lan>
 <500FB279.1020904@odi.ch>
 <20120725184205.GA3119@joi.lan>
 <50113E76.9090706@odi.ch>
 <20120729201532.GA3566@joi.lan>
 <50166D15.7090305@odi.ch>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <50166D15.7090305@odi.ch>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Ortwin =?utf-8?B?R2zDvGNr?= <odi@odi.ch>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bskeggs@redhat.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, airlied@redhat.com
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org

On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 01:16:37PM +0200, Ortwin Gl=C3=BCck wrote:
> On 29.07.2012 22:15, Marcin Slusarz wrote:
> > No, the real problem is: with "noaccel" we don't register "software=
 engine",
> > but vblank ISR relies on its existance and happily derefences NULL =
pointer.
> >
> > Now, this patch should fix it for real...
>=20
> Unfortunately I am still seeing the crash. Without "noaccel" it works=
 though=20
> (until X crashes the machine, but that is a different thing).

Are you sure you boot the correct kernel? I'm asking because your panic=
 says its
version is "3.5.0 #3" - exactly the same as in previous crash log.

Marcin