Re: [PATCH 3/3] regmap: enhance regmap-irq to handle 1 IRQ feeding n chips

[Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>]

On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:00:04AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 07/29/2012 02:36 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 01:01:56PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:

> I had implemented this in regmap since you'd specifically mentioned
> doing that. If I convert the code not to use separate IRQ domains for

I think what I'd said was that we should factor it out rather than that
it should be specifically done in regmap.

> this, would that be acceptable?

Probably.

> >> +	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(d->dev);
> >> +	if (ret < 0) {

> > This is conditional in the core regmap runtime PM support, it may be
> > actively harmful if the device doesn't need it.

> Hmmm. I actually don't see any pm_*() usage in regmap right now. I
> assume this /is/ needed to convert arizona.c, since it's making these
> calls today. I don't need it for max8907.c. Should I add another flag to
> regmap_add_irq_chips() indicating whether this is needed, or ...?

It's not in -next yet due to the merge window.  There's already a flag
for it in the irq chip data.