From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: Kernel crash with acpi_processor, cpu_idle and intel_idle =y Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 19:42:07 -0400 Message-ID: <20120731234207.GJ32698@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <20120722181611.7ae03506@internecto.net> <20120723142025.GB793@phenom.dumpdata.com> <20120726022527.4d3f6e4a@internecto.net> <20120726140552.GD28024@phenom.dumpdata.com> <501176DD0200007800090A32@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <20120726145535.GA5743@phenom.dumpdata.com> <20120728145515.50bf4d45@internecto.net> <501657C70200007800091357@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <20120731134054.GD4789@phenom.dumpdata.com> <20120731235039.6cddfc55@internecto.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120731235039.6cddfc55@internecto.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Mark van Dijk Cc: Jan Beulich , xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:50:39PM +0200, Mark van Dijk wrote: > Message 20120731134054.GD4789@phenom.dumpdata.com contained: > > >Duh! That is easy enough to fix. Mark, can you please try testing with > >this patch (and obviously enable the CONFIG_INTEL_IDLE) > >(patch omitted) > > Sure, I'll try it right now. > > Incidentally I came across a thread suggesting that there is quite a > lot happening in the world of cpuidle. So I want to make sure that > any implementation from your end isn't / won't be in conflict with code > from other sources. > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/28/186 > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/29/48 ah yes. I recall seeing those. I ought to be OK. > > I trust you'll be able to track this down far better than I can, > meanwhile I'll test this patch you sent me. Thank you.