From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olaf Hering Subject: Re: [PATCH] stubdom: disable parallel build Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 14:18:31 +0200 Message-ID: <20120801121831.GA24090@aepfle.de> References: <1343723296.15432.62.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <20120731125021.GA11261@aepfle.de> <1343820387.27221.66.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1343820387.27221.66.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, Aug 01, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 13:50 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 31, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > > > I suspect something is not quite right in the top level Makefile WRT the > > > dependencies between tools and stubdom builds. > > > > Doing a s@$(CROSS_MAKE)@$(MAKE) DESTDIR=@g in stubdom/Makefile fixes it > > for me: > > Can anyone who understands Make explain why this should make a > difference? > > I would have expected that > FOO := $(BAR) baz > ... > $(FOO) bif > ought to be identical to > $(BAR) baz bif > > Is that not the case? MAKE is handled special if written in a receipe: http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/MAKE-Variable.html That does not really explain why it makes a difference in the case of stubdom. Olaf