From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
"Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>,
"stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com"
<stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [HYBRID]: status update...
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 12:05:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120801160515.GA16155@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFLBxZb=yzcmxewCei49M6DX16x7eKZRGmxMUDbaKOTXgGZCGA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 04:59:58PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 04:25:01PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> >> I hope this isn't bikeshedding; but I don't like "Hybrid" as a name
> >> for this feature, mainly for "marketing" reasons. I think it will
> >> probably give people the wrong idea about what the technology does.
> >> PV domains is one of Xen's really distinct advantages -- much simpler
> >> interface, lighter-weight (no qemu, legacy boot), &c &c. As I
> >> understand it, the mode you've been calling "hybrid" still has all of
> >> these advantages -- it just uses some of the HVM hardware extensions
> >> to make the interface even simpler / faster. I'm afraid "hybrid" may
> >> be seen as, "Even Xen has had to give up on PV."
> >>
> >> Can I suggest something like "PVH" instead? That (at least to me)
> >> makes it clear that PV domains are still fully PV, but just use some
> >> HVM extensions.
> >
> > if (xen_pvh_domain()?
> >
> > if (xen_pv_h_domain()?
> >
> > if (xen_h_domain()) ?
> >
> > if (xen_pvplus_domain()) ?
> >
> > if (xen_pv_ext_domain()) ?
> >
> > I think I like 'pv+'?
>
> I could deal with pv+. However, in general I dislike that kind of
> "now even better!" marketing. PV+, EPV (Enhanced / extended PV), PVX
> (Extreme PV!) -- they all sound cool when they come out, but five
> years later, when they're not so new or sexy anymore, they all sound
> lame. PVH is just descriptive -- it will always be PV with HVM
> extensions, so it will age much better. :-)
How about pv_with_mmu_in_hvm_container_domain() ?
Ok, that is a bit to lengthy. How about then:
if (xen_pvhvm_ext_domain()) ?
The 'if (xen_pvh_domain())' is just one characer short of 'xen_pv_domain()'
and one might not notice it. Perhaps then 'if (xen_pv_h_domain()' ?
>
> -George
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-01 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-27 1:17 [HYBRID]: status update Mukesh Rathor
2012-06-27 2:10 ` Mukesh Rathor
2012-06-28 8:44 ` Ian Campbell
2012-07-03 19:24 ` Mukesh Rathor
2012-07-04 10:01 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-07-04 23:13 ` Mukesh Rathor
2012-07-05 14:05 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-01 15:25 ` George Dunlap
2012-08-01 15:25 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-01 15:59 ` George Dunlap
2012-08-01 16:05 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2012-08-01 16:21 ` George Dunlap
2012-08-01 16:51 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2012-08-01 16:55 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-01 16:53 ` HYBRID naming [Was: Re: [HYBRID]: status update...] Matt Wilson
2012-08-02 11:41 ` George Dunlap
2012-08-04 1:06 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2012-08-01 16:05 ` [HYBRID]: status update Andrew Cooper
2012-08-01 16:08 ` Ian Campbell
2012-08-01 16:02 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2012-08-01 22:34 ` Mukesh Rathor
2012-08-02 9:53 ` George Dunlap
2012-08-02 14:24 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-13 22:14 ` Mukesh Rathor
2012-08-14 10:44 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-14 17:38 ` Mukesh Rathor
2012-08-14 17:42 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-14 17:51 ` Mukesh Rathor
2012-08-15 8:19 ` Jan Beulich
2012-08-15 9:42 ` Ian Campbell
2012-08-15 9:54 ` Jan Beulich
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-05-11 1:02 [HYBRID] : " Mukesh Rathor
2012-05-11 1:40 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-11 8:03 ` Ian Campbell
2012-05-11 6:14 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120801160515.GA16155@phenom.dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
--cc=keir.xen@gmail.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.