From: "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@iki.fi>
To: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: lars.kurth@xen.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: Proposal: Xen Test Days
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 22:50:21 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120801195021.GD19851@reaktio.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFLBxZaWGBv5dxC9rYKJqrKV7faewhmEuGxM2XsTZ633QuMong@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 03:50:16PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xen.org> wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > at OSCON I had a couple of discussions regarding Fedora-like Xen Test Days.
> > It may be a little bit late for this release putting all the documentation
> > together (i.e. a TODO list of what we want to community and distros which
> > consume Xen) to test to pull this off for this release cycle.
> >
> > But I wanted to raise this as possibility and maybe something to build into
> > future release cycles. If I look at http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_4.2 there
> > is fairly little (or in fact almost nothing) we have in terms of how new
> > functionality would be tested. My gut feel is that the biggest benefit of a
> > Xen test Day for 4.2 may be in testing XL. There were some improvements last
> > Monday, but I am not sure this is enough.
> >
> > If I look at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Test_Days they have spent
> > quite a bit of effort on this, and it would probably take one person a week
> > or two full-time to pull this together. Also see,
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:Current
> >
> > I just wanted to put this out there to see whether we should try for this
> > release cycle and gather views. It would require a volunteer to step up. If
> > the view is that this is not doable for 4.2, this may be a good thing to
> > either try for patch releases as well as maybe for Xen 4.3
>
> I think for 4.2, the key thing we want to test is the xm -> xl
> transition; and the instructions for that are really simple --
> basically, "Do what you normally do using xl instead of xm". :-)
> Secondary things we want tested involve just installing it on
> different software setups (e.g., distros), and hardware testing. But
> I think those will come as a matter of course with the first one.
>
Xen hypervisor UEFI boot testing would be nice aswell.. Xen 4.2 has the hypervisor EFI patches,
but dom0 kernel also needs EFI patches, and that makes testing a bit more difficult..
Upstream Linux pvops dom0 kernel doesn't have EFI support yet,
only Suse's xenlinux patches have EFI support afaik..
-- Pasi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-01 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-01 12:08 Proposal: Xen Test Days Lars Kurth
2012-08-01 14:50 ` George Dunlap
2012-08-01 16:23 ` Lars Kurth
2012-08-01 19:50 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen [this message]
2012-08-02 6:57 ` Ian Campbell
2012-08-02 13:33 ` Lars Kurth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120801195021.GD19851@reaktio.net \
--to=pasik@iki.fi \
--cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=lars.kurth@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.