From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50055)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jbaron@redhat.com>) id 1SymWe-0008PK-D4
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 12:20:57 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jbaron@redhat.com>) id 1SymWc-0008WU-9X
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 12:20:56 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:9127)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jbaron@redhat.com>) id 1SymWc-0008Vp-1H
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 12:20:54 -0400
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 12:20:52 -0400
From: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20120807162052.GB2411@redhat.com>
References: <20120807160106.GA2411@redhat.com>
 <50213EA5.6080303@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <50213EA5.6080303@suse.de>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ahci live migration
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?F=E4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, aliguori@us.ibm.com, mst@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, agraf@suse.de, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kraxel@redhat.com

On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 06:13:25PM +0200, Andreas F=E4rber wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>=20
> Am 07.08.2012 18:01, schrieb Jason Baron:
> > Hi,
> >=20
> > vmstate_ahci has its 'unmigratable' bit set. Gerd suggested that ther=
e was work
> > in this area. Anybody know the status on it?
>=20
> That was me working on it. I have a branch corresponding to an RFC I
> sent around Christmas - issue being how to model the variable number of
> ports in VMSD - that I need to update to the latest suggestion by Igor.
>=20
> Jason/Kevin, should I prioritize that for 1.2? Or is that a -next topic=
?
>=20

I ran into while trying to test q35 live migration (which currently
aborts due to no ahci support). If you have any updated code, I can test
it for you :)

Thanks,

-Jason