All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jack Morgenstein <jackm-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Roland Dreier <roland-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: 3.6-rc1 IB complaint
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 15:08:17 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201208081508.17663.jackm@dev.mellanox.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <502146C1.80405-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>

Hi Bart,

I submitted a patch to Roland on August 3 (along with SRIOV-IB V2) to fix this:
 
[PATCH] IB/mlx4: fix possible deadlock with sm_lock spinlock

I notice that you tested out the fix and it worked.

Roland, please take the patch and submit to Linus. This fixes a bug in
the upstream 3.6-RC1 code.

Thanks!

-Jack

On Tuesday 07 August 2012 19:48, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Has anyone else already seen the ugly kernel message below ? This
> message is generated during boot and prevents my IB HCA to come up
> properly with 3.6-rc1. This did not happen with kernel 3.5.
> 
> =================================
> [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
> 3.6.0-rc1-debug+ #1 Not tainted
> ---------------------------------
> inconsistent {HARDIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-HARDIRQ-W} usage.
> swapper/1/0 [HC1[1]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] takes:
>  (&(&ibdev->sm_lock)->rlock){?.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa0328df4>] update_sm_ah+0x94/0xd0 [mlx4_ib]
> {HARDIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
>   [<ffffffff81095e8a>] __lock_acquire+0x66a/0x1ca0
>   [<ffffffff81097ac5>] lock_acquire+0x95/0x130
>   [<ffffffff8140e815>] _raw_spin_lock+0x45/0x80
>   [<ffffffffa0329b6b>] mlx4_ib_process_mad+0x58b/0x7a0 [mlx4_ib]
>   [<ffffffffa03178be>] ib_post_send_mad+0x34e/0x6d0 [ib_mad]
>   [<ffffffffa033afc5>] ib_umad_write+0x515/0x630 [ib_umad]
>   [<ffffffff8114e41e>] vfs_write+0xce/0x170
>   [<ffffffff8114e724>] sys_write+0x54/0xa0
>   [<ffffffff81417692>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> irq event stamp: 306104
> hardirqs last  enabled at (306101): [<ffffffff8100ae75>] mwait_idle+0x95/0x180
> hardirqs last disabled at (306102): [<ffffffff8140f5e7>] common_interrupt+0x67/0x6c
> softirqs last  enabled at (306104): [<ffffffff81045793>] _local_bh_enable+0x13/0x20
> softirqs last disabled at (306103): [<ffffffff81046045>] irq_enter+0x75/0x90
> 
> other info that might help us debug this:
>  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> 
>        CPU0
>        ----
>   lock(&(&ibdev->sm_lock)->rlock);
>   <Interrupt>
>     lock(&(&ibdev->sm_lock)->rlock);
> 
>  *** DEADLOCK ***
> 
> 1 lock held by swapper/1/0:
>  #0:  (&(&priv->ctx_lock)->rlock){-.....}, at: [<ffffffffa02472c9>] mlx4_dispatch_event+0x39/0x90 [mlx4_core]
> 
> stack backtrace:
> Pid: 0, comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 3.6.0-rc1-debug+ #1
> Call Trace:
>  <IRQ>  [<ffffffff81095429>] print_usage_bug+0x219/0x220
>  [<ffffffff8109579f>] mark_lock+0x36f/0x3f0
>  [<ffffffff8109602a>] __lock_acquire+0x80a/0x1ca0
>  [<ffffffff81097ac5>] lock_acquire+0x95/0x130
>  [<ffffffffa0328df4>] ? update_sm_ah+0x94/0xd0 [mlx4_ib]
>  [<ffffffffa02f492b>] ? rdma_port_get_link_layer+0x1b/0x40 [ib_core]
>  [<ffffffff8140e815>] _raw_spin_lock+0x45/0x80
>  [<ffffffffa0328df4>] ? update_sm_ah+0x94/0xd0 [mlx4_ib]
>  [<ffffffffa02f42aa>] ? ib_create_ah+0x1a/0x40 [ib_core]
>  [<ffffffffa0328df4>] update_sm_ah+0x94/0xd0 [mlx4_ib]
>  [<ffffffffa032957b>] handle_port_mgmt_change_event+0xeb/0x150 [mlx4_ib]
>  [<ffffffffa0329ed0>] mlx4_ib_event+0x120/0x170 [mlx4_ib]
>  [<ffffffff8140e9f3>] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x83/0xa0
>  [<ffffffffa02472c9>] ? mlx4_dispatch_event+0x39/0x90 [mlx4_core]
>  [<ffffffffa02472fc>] mlx4_dispatch_event+0x6c/0x90 [mlx4_core]
>  [<ffffffffa0241a80>] mlx4_eq_int+0x4d0/0x920 [mlx4_core]
>  [<ffffffff8107673f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60
>  [<ffffffffa0241ee4>] mlx4_msi_x_interrupt+0x14/0x20 [mlx4_core]
>  [<ffffffff810bd215>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x75/0x230
>  [<ffffffff810bd41e>] handle_irq_event+0x4e/0x80
>  [<ffffffff810bfd55>] handle_edge_irq+0x85/0x130
>  [<ffffffff81004375>] handle_irq+0x25/0x40
>  [<ffffffff81418ddd>] do_IRQ+0x5d/0xe0
>  [<ffffffff8140f5ec>] common_interrupt+0x6c/0x6c
>  <EOI>  [<ffffffff8100ae7e>] ? mwait_idle+0x9e/0x180
>  [<ffffffff8100ae75>] ? mwait_idle+0x95/0x180
>  [<ffffffff8100b7a6>] cpu_idle+0xa6/0xe0
>  [<ffffffff8140777d>] start_secondary+0x204/0x206
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

      parent reply	other threads:[~2012-08-08 12:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-07 16:48 3.6-rc1 IB complaint Bart Van Assche
     [not found] ` <502146C1.80405-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org>
2012-08-08 12:08   ` Jack Morgenstein [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201208081508.17663.jackm@dev.mellanox.co.il \
    --to=jackm-ldsdmyg8hgv8yrgs2mwiifqbs+8scbdb@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=bvanassche-HInyCGIudOg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=roland-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.