Re: [RFC net-next 0/4] gianfar: Use separate NAPI for Tx confirmation processing

[Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>]

[[RFC net-next 0/4] gianfar: Use separate NAPI for Tx confirmation processing] On 08/08/2012 (Wed 15:26) Claudiu Manoil wrote:

> Hi all,
> This set of patches basically splits the existing napi poll routine into
> two separate napi functions, one for Rx processing (triggered by frame
> receive interrupts only) and one for the Tx confirmation path processing
> (triggerred by Tx confirmation interrupts only). The polling algorithm
> behind remains much the same.
> 
> Important throughput improvements have been noted on low power boards with
> this set of changes.
> For instance, for the following netperf test:
> netperf -l 20 -cC -H 192.168.10.1 -t TCP_STREAM -- -m 1500
> yields a throughput gain from oscilating ~500-~700 Mbps to steady ~940 Mbps,
> (if the Rx/Tx paths are processed on different cores), w/ no increase in CPU%,
> on a p1020rdb - 2 core machine featuring etsec2.0 (Multi-Queue Multi-Group
> driver mode).

It would be interesting to know more about what was causing that large
an oscillation -- presumably you will have it reappear once one core
becomes 100% utilized.  Also, any thoughts on how the change will change
performance on an older low power single core gianfar system (e.g.  83xx)?

P.
--

> 
> Also, this change, which should ballance Rx and Tx processing, proves to
> be effective against Rx busy interrupt occurrences.
> 
> Thanks for your review.
> Claudiu
> 
> 
> Claudiu Manoil (4):
>   gianfar: Remove redundant programming of [rt]xic registers
>   gianfar: Clear ievent from interrupt handler for [RT]x int
>   gianfar: Separate out the Rx and Tx coalescing functions
>   gianfar: Use separate NAPIs for Tx and Rx processing
> 
>  drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/gianfar.c |  220 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/gianfar.h |   16 ++-
>  2 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
> 
>