From: Jean Guyader <jean.guyader@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "Tim (Xen.org)" <tim@xen.org>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
Jean Guyader <jean.guyader@gmail.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] xen: events, exposes evtchn_alloc_unbound_domain
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 08:51:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120810075100.GA30606@spongy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5024D5D00200007800094134@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1097 bytes --]
On 10/08 08:35, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 10.08.12 at 01:25, Jean Guyader <jean.guyader@citrix.com> wrote:
> >--- a/xen/common/event_channel.c
> >+++ b/xen/common/event_channel.c
> >@@ -159,9 +159,8 @@ static int get_free_port(struct domain *d)
> >
> > static long evtchn_alloc_unbound(evtchn_alloc_unbound_t *alloc)
> > {
> >- struct evtchn *chn;
> > struct domain *d;
> >- int port;
> >+ evtchn_port_t port;
> > domid_t dom = alloc->dom;
> > long rc;
> >
> >@@ -169,26 +168,47 @@ static long evtchn_alloc_unbound(evtchn_alloc_unbound_t *alloc)
> > if ( rc )
> > return rc;
> >
> >+ rc = evtchn_alloc_unbound_domain(d, &port,
>
> Any reason you can't pass &alloc->port here directly?
>
> >+ alloc->remote_dom == DOMID_SELF ? current->domain->domain_id
> >+ : alloc->remote_dom);
>
> Any reason this can't/shouldn't be done in the called function?
>
No specific reason for both of those thing. Here is a new version based
on your comments.
Thanks for reviewing,
Jean
[-- Attachment #2: evtchn_alloc_unbound_domain.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 2808 bytes --]
commit 208384d74852df9ae26294236d79e33967a75afa
Author: Jean Guyader <jean.guyader@citrix.com>
Date: Thu Aug 2 16:19:23 2012 +0100
xen: events, exposes evtchn_alloc_unbound_domain
Exposes evtchn_alloc_unbound_domain to the rest of
Xen so we can create allocated unbound evtchn within Xen.
diff --git a/xen/common/event_channel.c b/xen/common/event_channel.c
index 53777f8..fd626bf 100644
--- a/xen/common/event_channel.c
+++ b/xen/common/event_channel.c
@@ -159,36 +159,53 @@ static int get_free_port(struct domain *d)
static long evtchn_alloc_unbound(evtchn_alloc_unbound_t *alloc)
{
- struct evtchn *chn;
struct domain *d;
- int port;
- domid_t dom = alloc->dom;
long rc;
- rc = rcu_lock_target_domain_by_id(dom, &d);
+ rc = rcu_lock_target_domain_by_id(alloc->dom, &d);
if ( rc )
return rc;
+ rc = evtchn_alloc_unbound_domain(d, &alloc->port, alloc->remote_dom);
+ if ( rc )
+ ERROR_EXIT_DOM((int)rc, d);
+
+ out:
+ rcu_unlock_domain(d);
+
+ return rc;
+}
+
+int evtchn_alloc_unbound_domain(struct domain *d, evtchn_port_t *port,
+ domid_t remote_domid)
+{
+ struct evtchn *chn;
+ int rc;
+ int free_port;
+
spin_lock(&d->event_lock);
- if ( (port = get_free_port(d)) < 0 )
- ERROR_EXIT_DOM(port, d);
- chn = evtchn_from_port(d, port);
+ rc = free_port = get_free_port(d);
+ if ( free_port < 0 )
+ goto out;
- rc = xsm_evtchn_unbound(d, chn, alloc->remote_dom);
+ chn = evtchn_from_port(d, free_port);
+ rc = xsm_evtchn_unbound(d, chn, remote_domid);
if ( rc )
goto out;
chn->state = ECS_UNBOUND;
- if ( (chn->u.unbound.remote_domid = alloc->remote_dom) == DOMID_SELF )
+ if ( (chn->u.unbound.remote_domid = remote_domid) == DOMID_SELF )
chn->u.unbound.remote_domid = current->domain->domain_id;
- alloc->port = port;
+ chn->u.unbound.remote_domid = remote_domid;
+
+ *port = free_port;
+ /* Everything is fine, returns 0 */
+ rc = 0;
out:
spin_unlock(&d->event_lock);
- rcu_unlock_domain(d);
-
return rc;
}
diff --git a/xen/include/xen/event.h b/xen/include/xen/event.h
index 71c3e92..1a0c832 100644
--- a/xen/include/xen/event.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/event.h
@@ -69,6 +69,9 @@ int guest_enabled_event(struct vcpu *v, uint32_t virq);
/* Notify remote end of a Xen-attached event channel.*/
void notify_via_xen_event_channel(struct domain *ld, int lport);
+int evtchn_alloc_unbound_domain(struct domain *d, evtchn_port_t *port,
+ domid_t remote_domid);
+
/* Internal event channel object accessors */
#define bucket_from_port(d,p) \
((d)->evtchn[(p)/EVTCHNS_PER_BUCKET])
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-10 7:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-03 19:50 [PATCH 0/5] RFC: V4V (v3) Jean Guyader
2012-08-03 19:50 ` [PATCH 1/5] xen: add ssize_t Jean Guyader
2012-08-06 8:08 ` Jan Beulich
2012-08-06 14:47 ` Jean Guyader
2012-08-09 9:51 ` Tim Deegan
2012-08-09 10:19 ` Jean Guyader
2012-08-09 10:39 ` Jan Beulich
2012-08-09 10:48 ` Jean Guyader
2012-08-09 13:02 ` Jan Beulich
2012-08-09 10:59 ` Tim Deegan
2012-08-09 11:08 ` Jean Guyader
2012-08-03 19:50 ` [PATCH 2/5] xen: Introduce guest_handle_for_field Jean Guyader
2012-08-03 19:50 ` [PATCH 3/5] xen: virq, remove VIRQ_XC_RESERVED Jean Guyader
2012-08-06 8:10 ` Jan Beulich
2012-08-06 14:46 ` Jean Guyader
2012-08-06 14:49 ` Andrew Cooper
2012-08-06 14:56 ` Ian Campbell
2012-08-06 15:01 ` Jean Guyader
2012-08-06 15:13 ` Ian Campbell
2012-08-06 15:46 ` Jan Beulich
2012-08-03 19:50 ` [PATCH 4/5] xen: events, exposes evtchn_alloc_unbound_domain Jean Guyader
2012-08-06 8:19 ` Jan Beulich
2012-08-09 10:06 ` Tim Deegan
2012-08-09 10:23 ` Ian Campbell
2012-08-09 10:35 ` Tim Deegan
2012-08-09 10:40 ` Jean Guyader
2012-08-09 23:25 ` Jean Guyader
2012-08-10 7:35 ` Jan Beulich
2012-08-10 7:51 ` Jean Guyader [this message]
2012-08-10 7:57 ` Jan Beulich
2012-08-23 12:03 ` Jean Guyader
2012-08-03 19:50 ` [PATCH 5/5] xen: Add V4V implementation Jean Guyader
2012-08-06 8:45 ` Jan Beulich
2012-08-23 11:57 ` Jean Guyader
2012-08-24 20:06 ` Jan Beulich
2012-09-01 20:58 ` Jean Guyader
2012-09-01 20:56 ` Jean Guyader
2013-06-11 17:10 ` [PATCH 5/5] xen: Add V4V implementation - padding question Ross Philipson
2013-06-11 17:25 ` Tim Deegan
2013-06-11 17:40 ` Ross Philipson
2013-06-11 17:54 ` Ross Philipson
2013-06-11 18:04 ` Tim Deegan
2013-06-12 7:45 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-13 17:21 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-09 10:38 ` [PATCH 5/5] xen: Add V4V implementation Tim Deegan
2012-08-10 16:51 ` Jean Guyader
2012-08-13 9:38 ` Tim Deegan
2012-08-13 12:43 ` Jean Guyader
2012-08-16 12:32 ` Tim Deegan
2012-08-04 13:24 ` [PATCH 0/5] RFC: V4V (v3) Jean Guyader
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120810075100.GA30606@spongy \
--to=jean.guyader@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=jean.guyader@gmail.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.