All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/1] USB: EHCI: Initialize multiple USB controllers at once
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 01:46:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201208120146.32785.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B9C9637D5087840A465BDCB251780E9E2D750F10C@HKMAIL02.nvidia.com>

Dear Jim Lin,

> Add support for command line "usb reset" or "usb start" to initialize
> , "usb stop" to stop multiple USB controllers at once.
> Other command like "usb tree" also supports multiple controllers.
> 
> New added definitions in header file are:
> CONFIG_USB_MULTI
> CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jim Lin <jilin@nvidia.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Renaming from CONFIG_USB_INIT_MULTI to CONFIG_USB_MULTI
> - Define CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT as 1 if not defined
> - Remove volatile from structure ehci_ctrl of ehci-hcd.c for a
> checkpatch.pl warning
> 
>  common/cmd_usb.c            |   10 +++
>  common/usb.c                |   98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  common/usb_hub.c            |    4 +
>  drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c |  167
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- drivers/usb/host/ehci.h     |  
>  5 ++
>  include/usb.h               |   12 +++
>  6 files changed, 251 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/common/cmd_usb.c b/common/cmd_usb.c
> index a8e3ae5..8d3093b 100644
> --- a/common/cmd_usb.c
> +++ b/common/cmd_usb.c
> @@ -554,7 +554,17 @@ int do_usb(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char
> * const argv[]) }
>         if (strncmp(argv[1], "tree", 4) == 0) {
>                 printf("\nDevice Tree:\n");
> +#ifdef CONFIG_USB_MULTI

How's this supposed to work? Shouldn't this call usb_show_tree on roots of all 
the trees?

> +               for (i = 0; i < USB_MAX_DEVICE; i++) {
> +                       dev = usb_get_dev_index(i);
> +                       if (dev == NULL)
> +                               break;
> +                       if (dev->parent == NULL)
> +                               usb_show_tree(dev);
> +               }
> +#else
>                 usb_show_tree(usb_get_dev_index(0));
> +#endif
>                 return 0;
>         }
>         if (strncmp(argv[1], "inf", 3) == 0) {
> diff --git a/common/usb.c b/common/usb.c
> index 1b40228..065c70c 100644
> --- a/common/usb.c
> +++ b/common/usb.c
> @@ -77,6 +77,89 @@ static int asynch_allowed;
> 
>  char usb_started; /* flag for the started/stopped USB status */
> 
> +#ifdef CONFIG_USB_MULTI
> +/*************************************************************************
> ** + * Init USB Device
> + */
> +#ifndef CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT
> +#define CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT 1
> +#endif
> +
> +int usb_init(void)
> +{
> +       void *ctrl;
> +       int i;
> +       struct usb_device *dev;
> +
> +       running = 0;
> +       dev_index = 0;
> +       asynch_allowed = 1;
> +       usb_hub_reset();
> +
> +       /* first make all devices unknown */
> +       for (i = 0; i < USB_MAX_DEVICE; i++) {
> +               memset(&usb_dev[i], 0, sizeof(struct usb_device));
> +               usb_dev[i].devnum = -1;
> +       }
> +
> +       /* init low_level USB */
> +       printf("USB:   ");
> +       for (i = 0; i < CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT; i++) {
> +               /* init low_level USB */
> +               ctrl = usb_lowlevel_init(i);
> +               /*
> +                * if lowlevel init is OK, scan the bus for devices
> +                * i.e. search HUBs and configure them
> +                */
> +               if (ctrl) {
> +                       running = 1;
> +
> +                       printf("scanning bus for devices... ");
> +                       dev = usb_alloc_new_device(ctrl);
> +                       /*
> +                        * device 0 is always present
> +                        * (root hub, so let it analyze)
> +                        */
> +                       if (dev)
> +                               usb_new_device(dev);
> +               }
> +       }
> +
> +       if (running) {
> +               if (!dev_index)
> +                       printf("No USB Device found\n");
> +               else
> +                       printf("%d USB Device(s) found\n", dev_index);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_USB_KEYBOARD
> +       drv_usb_kbd_init();

Will the keyboard driver survive this?

> +#endif
> +       USB_PRINTF("scan end\n");
> +               usb_started = 1;
> +               return 0;
> +       } else {
> +               printf("Error, couldn't init Lowlevel part\n");
> +               usb_started = 0;
> +               return -1;
> +       }
> +}
> +
> +/*************************************************************************
> ***** + * Stop USB this stops the LowLevel Part and deregisters USB
> devices. + */
> +int usb_stop(void)
> +{
> +       int i;
> +
> +       if (usb_started) {
> +               asynch_allowed = 1;
> +               usb_started = 0;
> +               usb_hub_reset();
> +               for (i = 0; i < CONFIG_USB_MAX_CONTROLLER_COUNT; i++)
> +                       usb_lowlevel_stop(i);
> +       }
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +#else
>  /**********************************************************************
>   * some forward declerations...
>   */
> @@ -127,6 +210,7 @@ int usb_stop(void)
>         }
>         return res;
>  }
> +#endif
> 
>  /*
>   * disables the asynch behaviour of the control message. This is used for
> data @@ -750,11 +834,18 @@ struct usb_device *usb_get_dev_index(int index)
> return &usb_dev[index];
>  }
> 
> -
> +#ifdef CONFIG_USB_MULTI

I still believe it's possible to get rid of this MULTI crap, simply set the 
"multiness" to 1 for non-multi setups. How big overhead will that generate?
[...]
btw you might want to rebase on top of latest u-boot-usb.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-11 23:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-08  9:48 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/1] USB: EHCI: Initialize multiple USB controllers at once Jim Lin
2012-08-11 23:46 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2012-08-13 10:25   ` Jim Lin
2012-08-14 17:29     ` Marek Vasut
2012-08-14  4:22   ` Jim Lin
2012-08-14 16:18     ` Stephen Warren
2012-08-14 17:30       ` Marek Vasut
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-08-10  9:36 Jim Lin
2012-08-10 16:07 ` Stephen Warren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201208120146.32785.marex@denx.de \
    --to=marex@denx.de \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.