From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gleb Natapov Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] kvm: notify host when the guest is panicked Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 12:56:30 +0300 Message-ID: <20120815095630.GT11194@redhat.com> References: <5021D235.4050800@cn.fujitsu.com> <20120813182132.GB25268@amt.cnet> <20120814085619.GA32708@redhat.com> <502A2B7A.3070801@siemens.com> <86E2467F-0EA3-4A03-BD89-58E41F7DB808@redhat.com> <20120814154237.GA21284@amt.cnet> <87boidgvaq.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <20120814191927.GA6058@amt.cnet> <87txw5clmh.fsf@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Yan Vugenfirer , kvm list , Jan Kiszka , Marcelo Tosatti , qemu-devel , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Avi Kivity , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87txw5clmh.fsf@codemonkey.ws> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 02:35:34PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > Do you consider allowing support for Windows as overengineering? > > I don't think there is a way to hook BSOD on Windows so attempting to > engineer something that works with Windows seems odd, no? > Yan says in other email that is is possible to register a bugcheck callback. -- Gleb. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753065Ab2HOJ4k (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Aug 2012 05:56:40 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:31445 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751081Ab2HOJ4i (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Aug 2012 05:56:38 -0400 Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 12:56:30 +0300 From: Gleb Natapov To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , Yan Vugenfirer , kvm list , Jan Kiszka , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , qemu-devel , Avi Kivity , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8] kvm: notify host when the guest is panicked Message-ID: <20120815095630.GT11194@redhat.com> References: <5021D235.4050800@cn.fujitsu.com> <20120813182132.GB25268@amt.cnet> <20120814085619.GA32708@redhat.com> <502A2B7A.3070801@siemens.com> <86E2467F-0EA3-4A03-BD89-58E41F7DB808@redhat.com> <20120814154237.GA21284@amt.cnet> <87boidgvaq.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <20120814191927.GA6058@amt.cnet> <87txw5clmh.fsf@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87txw5clmh.fsf@codemonkey.ws> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 02:35:34PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > Do you consider allowing support for Windows as overengineering? > > I don't think there is a way to hook BSOD on Windows so attempting to > engineer something that works with Windows seems odd, no? > Yan says in other email that is is possible to register a bugcheck callback. -- Gleb. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34437) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T1aL8-0000Nz-CF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 05:56:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T1aL7-0006Ra-AN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 05:56:38 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:27465) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T1aL7-0006RQ-2I for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 05:56:37 -0400 Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 12:56:30 +0300 From: Gleb Natapov Message-ID: <20120815095630.GT11194@redhat.com> References: <5021D235.4050800@cn.fujitsu.com> <20120813182132.GB25268@amt.cnet> <20120814085619.GA32708@redhat.com> <502A2B7A.3070801@siemens.com> <86E2467F-0EA3-4A03-BD89-58E41F7DB808@redhat.com> <20120814154237.GA21284@amt.cnet> <87boidgvaq.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <20120814191927.GA6058@amt.cnet> <87txw5clmh.fsf@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87txw5clmh.fsf@codemonkey.ws> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8] kvm: notify host when the guest is panicked List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Yan Vugenfirer , kvm list , Jan Kiszka , Marcelo Tosatti , qemu-devel , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Avi Kivity , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 02:35:34PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > Do you consider allowing support for Windows as overengineering? > > I don't think there is a way to hook BSOD on Windows so attempting to > engineer something that works with Windows seems odd, no? > Yan says in other email that is is possible to register a bugcheck callback. -- Gleb.