[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] efikamx: remove drive strength hack from early_init_f and move it to the DCD

[Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>]

Dear Matt Sealey,

> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> > Dear Matt Sealey,
> > 
> >> The i.MX Boot ROM lets us set up certain registers before U-Boot even
> >> gets executed. Rather than setting up DDR, putting U-Boot in place, and
> >> getting into pre-relocation init to set up DDR again, just do it once
> >> in the correct place. This also solves an issue where the Smarttop DDR
> >> pad settings were being applied on Smartbook.
> >> 
> >> While we're at it, configure PCBID0,1,2 and the LED GPIO since we've
> >> still got room in the DCD to do so.
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> >> diff --git a/board/genesi/mx51_efikamx/imximage_mx.cfg
> >> b/board/genesi/mx51_efikamx/imximage_mx.cfg index 6fe0ff9..ac9aa9a
> >> 100644 --- a/board/genesi/mx51_efikamx/imximage_mx.cfg
> >> +++ b/board/genesi/mx51_efikamx/imximage_mx.cfg
> >> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> >> 
> >>  #
> >> 
> >> +# Copyright (C) 2009 Pegatron Corporation
> >> 
> >>  # Copyright (C) 2010 Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
> >> 
> >> -#
> >> -# BASED ON: imx51evk
> > 
> > Adding and removing these at will won't work I'm afraid.
> > 
> >> +# Copyright (C) 2009-2012 Genesi USA, Inc.
> >> 
> >>  #
> >>  # (C) Copyright 2009
> >>  # Stefano Babic DENX Software Engineering sbabic at denx.de.
> >> 
> >> @@ -43,48 +43,44 @@ BOOT_FROM spi
> >> 
> >>  #    Address   absolute address of the register
> >>  #    value     value to be stored in the register
> > 
> > So what is the actual change in the file? You replaced it with different
> > file, which makes it hard to review particular changes made.
> 
> Uhh no I edited each line manually and moved the comments to make it
> more readable. The actual changes is I reviewed the drive strength set
> function in efikamx.c and moved all the settings (minus any
> erroneously set bits and reproduced settings) into the DATA lines
> where necessary.

Maybe splitting it into smaller patches then won't hurt, with proper description 
etc.

> It's the same file but git doesn't do line-by-line diffs very well, it
> just seems to batch things into sections. I agree though I broke the
> copyright stuff, I got forced to use vim for about 10 minutes and I
> may have been a little heavy-handed :)

Definitelly

Best regards,
Marek Vasut