From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 21:18:45 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 03/14] arm: at91: at91sam9x5: fix gpio number per bank
In-Reply-To: <1344603731-32667-3-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
References: <20120810124820.GA20557@game.jcrosoft.org>
 <1344603731-32667-1-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
 <1344603731-32667-3-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Message-ID: <201208182118.45349.arnd@arndb.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Friday 10 August 2012, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio_atmel.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio_atmel.txt
> @@ -9,6 +9,10 @@ Required properties:
>    unused).
>  - gpio-controller: Marks the device node as a GPIO controller.
>  
> +optional properties:
> +- gpio-nb: Number of gpio if absent 32.
> +
> +
>  Example:
>         pioA: gpio at fffff200 {
>                 compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-gpio";
> @@ -16,5 +20,6 @@ Example:
>                 interrupts = <2 4>;
>                 #gpio-cells = <2>;
>                 gpio-controller;
> +               gpio-nb = <19>;

What does "nb" stand for?

The marvell-gpio binding uses "ngpio" for the number, so that would
already be established. Otherwise, I think "#gpio-lines" would be
more in line with other things we count in the bindings.

	Arnd