From: Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>
To: Daniel Pocock <daniel@pocock.com.au>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fail to mount after first reboot
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 15:51:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120819145124.GF30735@carfax.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5030F92A.4030309@pocock.com.au>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3428 bytes --]
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 02:33:14PM +0000, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> On 19/08/12 14:15, Hugo Mills wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 02:08:17PM +0000, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> >> I created a 1TB RAID1. So far it is just for testing, no important data
> >> on there.
> >>
> >> After a reboot, I tried to mount it again
> >>
> >> # mount /dev/mapper/vg00-btrfsvol0_0 /mnt/btrfs0
> >> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on
> >> /dev/mapper/vg00-btrfsvol0_0,
> >> missing codepage or helper program, or other error
> >> In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
> >> dmesg | tail or so
> >
> > With multi-volume btrfs filesystems, you have to run "btrfs dev
> > scan" before trying to mount it. Usually, the distribution will do
> > this in the initrd (if you've installed its btrfs-progs package).
>
> I'm running Debian, I've just updated the system from squeeze to wheezy
> (with 3.2 kernel) so I could try btrfs and do other QA testing on wheezy
> (as it is in the beta phase now)
>
> I already had the btrfs-tools package installed, before creating the
> filesystem. So it appears Debian doesn't have an init script
>
> It does have /lib/udev/rules.d/60-btrfs.rules:
> SUBSYSTEM!="block", GOTO="btrfs_end"
> ACTION!="add|change", GOTO="btrfs_end"
> ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}!="btrfs", GOTO="btrfs_end"
> RUN+="/sbin/modprobe btrfs"
> RUN+="/sbin/btrfs device scan $env{DEVNAME}"
>
> LABEL="btrfs_end"
>
> but I'm guessing that isn't any use to my logical volumes that are
> activated early in the boot sequence?
>
> Could I be having this problem because I put my btrfs on logical volumes?
Possibly. You may need the "Device mapper uevents" option in the
kernel (CONFIG_DM_UEVENT) to trigger that udev rule when you enable
your VG(s). Not sure if it's available/enabled in your kernel.
> Here is the package version I have:
>
> # dpkg --list | grep btrfs
> ii btrfs-tools 0.19+20120328-7
> Checksumming Copy on Write Filesystem utilities
That should be fine.
> Here is a more thorough dmesg, since boot, does this suggest the scan
> was invoked? I remember seeing some message about checking for btrfs
> filesystems just after selecting the kernel in grub (root is ext3)
That message was probably grub checking the FS.
> # dmesg | grep btrfs
> [ 40.677505] btrfs: setting nodatacow
> [ 40.677514] btrfs: turning off barriers
> [17216.145092] device fsid c959d4a5-0713-4685-b572-8a679ec37e20 devid 1
> transid 34 /dev/mapper/vg00-btrfsvol0_0
> [17216.145639] btrfs: disk space caching is enabled
> [17216.146987] btrfs: failed to read the system array on dm-100
> [17216.147556] btrfs: open_ctree failed
> [17310.978518] device fsid c959d4a5-0713-4685-b572-8a679ec37e20 devid 1
> transid 34 /dev/mapper/vg00-btrfsvol0_0
> [17310.993882] btrfs: disk space caching is enabled
> [17598.736657] device fsid c959d4a5-0713-4685-b572-8a679ec37e20 devid 1
> transid 37 /dev/mapper/vg00-btrfsvol0_0
> [17598.750849] btrfs: disk space caching is enabled
No, doesn't look like there were any scan results coming in before
17216.
Hugo.
--
=== Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk ===
PGP key: 515C238D from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk
--- In one respect at least, the Martians are a happy people: ---
they have no lawyers.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 190 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-19 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-19 14:08 fail to mount after first reboot Daniel Pocock
2012-08-19 14:15 ` Hugo Mills
2012-08-19 14:33 ` Daniel Pocock
2012-08-19 14:51 ` Hugo Mills [this message]
2012-08-19 16:02 ` Daniel Pocock
2012-08-20 18:47 ` Daniel Pocock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120819145124.GF30735@carfax.org.uk \
--to=hugo@carfax.org.uk \
--cc=daniel@pocock.com.au \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.