Re: [RFC PATCH] dtc: integrate gpp

[Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj-sclMFOaUSTBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>]

On 08:17 Thu 05 Jul     , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 14:12 Tue 03 Jul     , Stephen Warren wrote:
> > On 06/27/2012 03:41 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > > On 06/15/2012 12:53 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > >> From: Stephen Warren <swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > >>
> > >> I figured the easiest way to get named constants into dtc would be to
> > >> re-use an existing C pre-processor implemntation. Surprisingly, I could
> > >> not find many /good/ possibilities for this. I eventually found one called
> > >> gpp. This patch is an extremely quick-and-dirty integration of gpp into
> > >> dtc in order to solicit some feedback. What do people think of this
> > >> approach in general?
> > > 
> > > David, Jon,
> > > 
> > > What do you think of integrating gpp (or is there some alternative that
> > > would be better)? Does it seem a reasonable approach; should I work on
> > > addressing the TODO items I mentioned in the patch, or give up on this?
> > 
> > Are there any comments on this? Thanks.
> 
> I'm looking for this too
> 
> can we have a clear statement on it?
Stephan can you re send this one

we really need it to have a readable DT

Best Regards,
J.